Pavasuthipaisit K, Norman R L, Ellinwood W E, Oyama T T, Baughman W L, Spies H G
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983 Mar;56(3):541-8. doi: 10.1210/jcem-56-3-541.
Serum PRL, TSH, and T4 secretion during prolonged continuous or intermittent iv infusions of TRH were studied in 14 adult ovariectomized rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). For 9 days, TRH was administered intermittently at 0.33 or 3.3 micrograms/min for 6 of every 60 min and continuously at 0.33 micrograms/min. With both modes, the PRL levels and responsiveness to TRH simulation peaked on day 1 and then fell to levels that were still higher than the preinfusion values; levels for the intermittently treated group on days 3-9 were 2- to 4-fold above prestimulation levels and significantly (P less than 0.01) higher than levels for the continuously treated group. Elevated basal levels and PRL responses to TRH pulses were similar during the 0.33 and 3.3 micrograms/min pulses of the 9-day treatment period. For both TRH modes, TSH levels were elevated significantly (P less than 0.001) on day 1 [this increase was higher with continuous infusion (P less than 0.001)] and then fell to preinfusion levels by day 3. Serum T4 also increased during both continuous and intermittent TRH stimulations. However, serum T4 levels were significantly lower (P less than 0.01) after intermittent TRH (both 0.33 and 3.3 micrograms/min) than after continuous (0.33 micrograms) TRH (8 +/- 1.1 and 10 +/- 1.8 micrograms T4/dl vs. 18 +/- 3.1 micrograms, respectively). These PRL and T4 responses were replicated when the mode of administering 0.33 micrograms/min TRH was reversed after 9 days. An iv bolus of TRH (20 micrograms) after 9 days of continuous or intermittent TRH infusion caused significant release of PRL and TSH, an indication that neither mode of administration resulted in pituitary depletion of releasable hormone. We have concluded that intermittent TRH is more effective in elevating serum PRL, and continuous TRH is more effective in raising TSH and T4 levels. Thus, the manner of TRH secretion by the hypothalamus may determine its relative physiological importance in the stimulation of lactotropes and thyrotropes.
在14只成年去卵巢恒河猴(猕猴)中,研究了长时间持续或间歇性静脉输注促甲状腺激素释放激素(TRH)期间血清催乳素(PRL)、促甲状腺激素(TSH)和甲状腺素(T4)的分泌情况。连续9天,TRH以0.33或3.3微克/分钟的速度间歇性给药,每60分钟中的6分钟给药,同时以0.33微克/分钟的速度持续给药。两种给药方式下,PRL水平及对TRH刺激的反应性在第1天达到峰值,然后降至仍高于输注前水平;在第3 - 9天,间歇性治疗组的水平比刺激前水平高2至4倍,且显著高于连续治疗组(P < 0.01)。在9天治疗期的0.33和3.3微克/分钟脉冲给药期间,基础水平升高及PRL对TRH脉冲的反应相似。对于两种TRH给药方式,TSH水平在第1天显著升高(P < 0.001)[连续输注时升高幅度更大(P < 0.001)],到第3天降至输注前水平。在连续和间歇性TRH刺激期间,血清T4也升高。然而,间歇性TRH(0.33和3.3微克/分钟)刺激后的血清T4水平显著低于连续(0.33微克)TRH刺激后的水平(分别为8 ± 1.1和10 ± 1.8微克T4/分升对18 ± 3.1微克)。当9天后改变0.33微克/分钟TRH的给药方式时,这些PRL和T4反应得以重现。在连续或间歇性TRH输注9天后静脉推注TRH(20微克)可导致PRL和TSH显著释放,这表明两种给药方式均未导致垂体中可释放激素耗竭。我们得出结论,间歇性TRH在升高血清PRL方面更有效,而连续TRH在提高TSH和T4水平方面更有效。因此,下丘脑分泌TRH的方式可能决定其在刺激催乳素细胞和促甲状腺激素细胞方面的相对生理重要性。