Sears M R
Clin Allergy. 1983 May;13(3):253-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1983.tb02596.x.
The therapeutic effects of inhaled disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) and orally administered ketotifen were compared in thirty atopic asthmatics aged 15-34 years during a 22-week double-blind parallel group study. Ketotifen is a cycloheptathiophene with experimental antihistaminic, anti-allergic and anti-anaphylactic effects equal or superior to those of DSCG. During the first 6 weeks of treatment, mean airflow meter readings increased and bronchodilator use diminished in those receiving DSCG, but no improvement was seen in those given ketotifen. In the next 10 weeks, concomitant therapy was reduced in both groups, but this reduction was greater in the group receiving DSCG. No serious adverse effects occurred. Asthma worsened after abrupt discontinuation of DSCG but not ketotifen. Although a small number of patients may have benefited from ketotifen, its effect on asthma was not comparable with that of inhaled disodium cromoglycate.
在一项为期22周的双盲平行组研究中,对30名年龄在15至34岁的特应性哮喘患者比较了吸入色甘酸钠(DSCG)和口服酮替芬的治疗效果。酮替芬是一种环庚噻吩,其实验性抗组胺、抗过敏和抗过敏性作用等于或优于DSCG。在治疗的前6周,接受DSCG治疗的患者平均气流计读数增加,支气管扩张剂的使用减少,但给予酮替芬的患者未见改善。在接下来的10周,两组的联合治疗均减少,但接受DSCG治疗的组减少幅度更大。未发生严重不良反应。突然停用DSCG后哮喘恶化,但停用酮替芬后未出现这种情况。虽然少数患者可能从酮替芬中获益,但其对哮喘的疗效与吸入色甘酸钠不可比。