Suppr超能文献

[测量肾清除率的简化方法。51铬-乙二胺四乙酸斜率清除率、碘马尿酸盐清除率和内生肌酐清除率结果的比较]

[Simplified methods for the measurement of renal clearance. Comparison of the results of Cr51-EDTA slope clearance, iodohippurate clearance and endogenous creatinine clearance].

作者信息

Willich N, Heidenreich P, Renner D

出版信息

Rofo. 1983 May;138(5):553-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1055784.

Abstract

Endogenous creatinine clearance proved to be unreliable in comparison to the 51Cr-EDTA-slope clearance with compartment analysis (examination time 4 hours). Tauxe's method of estimation of GFR can be recommended because of nearly perfect correlation with the 51Cr-EDTA-slope clearance (r = 0.959, n = 169, p less than 0.001). Estimation of ERPF according to Tauxe showed a moderate good correlation (r = 0.843, n = 140, p less than 0.001) with Oberhausen's method of clearance calculation (shoulder detector technique).

摘要

与采用房室分析的51Cr-EDTA斜率清除率(检测时间4小时)相比,内源性肌酐清除率被证明不可靠。由于与51Cr-EDTA斜率清除率具有近乎完美的相关性(r = 0.959,n = 169,p<0.001),因此可以推荐Tauxe估算肾小球滤过率的方法。根据Tauxe法估算的有效肾血浆流量与Oberhausen的清除率计算方法(肩部探测器技术)显示出中度良好的相关性(r = 0.843,n = 140,p<0.001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验