Willich N, Heidenreich P, Renner D
Rofo. 1983 May;138(5):553-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1055784.
Endogenous creatinine clearance proved to be unreliable in comparison to the 51Cr-EDTA-slope clearance with compartment analysis (examination time 4 hours). Tauxe's method of estimation of GFR can be recommended because of nearly perfect correlation with the 51Cr-EDTA-slope clearance (r = 0.959, n = 169, p less than 0.001). Estimation of ERPF according to Tauxe showed a moderate good correlation (r = 0.843, n = 140, p less than 0.001) with Oberhausen's method of clearance calculation (shoulder detector technique).
与采用房室分析的51Cr-EDTA斜率清除率（检测时间4小时）相比，内源性肌酐清除率被证明不可靠。由于与51Cr-EDTA斜率清除率具有近乎完美的相关性（r = 0.959，n = 169，p＜0.001），因此可以推荐Tauxe估算肾小球滤过率的方法。根据Tauxe法估算的有效肾血浆流量与Oberhausen的清除率计算方法（肩部探测器技术）显示出中度良好的相关性（r = 0.843，n = 140，p＜0.001）。
