West T E, Burdash N M, Boehm A M, West M E
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Apr;17(4):567-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.4.567-570.1983.
A commercial kit from Diagnostica, Inc., Miami Fla., was studied for its ability to detect antibodies to the teichoic acids of Staphylococcus aureus. A comparative study of the Diagnostica counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) system and our gel double-diffusion method was undertaken with 156 serum samples from 142 patients. Included were 25 cases of staphylococcal and non-staphylococcal endocarditis, 30 cases of S. aureus bacteremia, 19 cases of nonbacteremic S. aureus infection, 39 cases of hospitalized patients without a staphylococcal infection, and 29 normal controls. Agreement between methodologies was attained in 138 (88.5%) of the 156 samples tested and in 127 (89.4%) of the 142 patients. Of 13 patients with culture-proven S. aureus endocarditis, significant antibody titers were found in all patients (100%) by CIE and in 12 patients (92.3%) by double diffusion. No significant titers were found in normal sera by CIE, but four sera were positive by double diffusion. Of 80 sera from patients with no evidence of S. aureus infection, 4 (5.0%) were positive by CIE and 7 (8.8%) were positive by double diffusion. The Diagnostica CIE kit appears to provide a suitable means for the detection of deep-seated S. aureus infections.
对佛罗里达州迈阿密市Diagnostica公司生产的一种商用试剂盒进行了研究,以检测其检测抗金黄色葡萄球菌磷壁酸抗体的能力。采用Diagnostica对流免疫电泳(CIE)系统和我们的凝胶双向扩散法,对142例患者的156份血清样本进行了对比研究。其中包括25例葡萄球菌性和非葡萄球菌性心内膜炎、30例金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症、19例非菌血症性金黄色葡萄球菌感染、39例无葡萄球菌感染的住院患者以及29例正常对照。在检测的156份样本中,138份(88.5%)两种方法结果一致;在142例患者中,127例(89.4%)结果一致。在13例经培养证实为金黄色葡萄球菌性心内膜炎的患者中,CIE法在所有患者(100%)中均检测到显著抗体滴度,双向扩散法在12例患者(92.3%)中检测到显著抗体滴度。CIE法在正常血清中未检测到显著滴度,但双向扩散法检测到4份血清呈阳性。在80份无金黄色葡萄球菌感染证据的患者血清中,CIE法检测到4份(5.0%)呈阳性,双向扩散法检测到7份(8.8%)呈阳性。Diagnostica CIE试剂盒似乎为检测深部金黄色葡萄球菌感染提供了一种合适的方法。