Modig J, Borg T, Bagge L, Saldeen T
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Jul;55(7):625-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.7.625.
Thirty patients undergoing total hip replacement were randomly allocated to one of two groups. One group (n = 14) received extradural anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline continued into the postoperative period (24 h) for pain relief. The other group (n = 16) received general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation, using nitrous oxide in oxygen and fentanyl i.v. Following surgery they received a narcotic analgesic i.m. on demand. Analysis of fibrinolysis inhibition activity and plasminogen activators revealed a significantly better fibrinolytic function in patients given continuous extradural anaesthesia than in those who received general anaesthesia followed by narcotics in the period after operation. Furthermore, the capacity for activation of factor VIII was significantly lower after operation in the former group.
30例行全髋关节置换术的患者被随机分为两组。一组(n = 14)接受硬膜外麻醉,使用含肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因,并持续至术后24小时以缓解疼痛。另一组(n = 16)接受全身麻醉及控制通气,采用氧化亚氮-氧气混合气体及静脉注射芬太尼。术后按需给予他们肌肉注射麻醉性镇痛药。对纤溶抑制活性和纤溶酶原激活剂的分析显示,持续硬膜外麻醉的患者在术后比接受全身麻醉后再使用麻醉性镇痛药的患者具有明显更好的纤溶功能。此外,前一组术后因子VIII的激活能力明显较低。