Stendahl U, Eklund G, Willén R
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1983;2(1):42-54. doi: 10.1097/00004347-198301000-00004.
The prognostic values of clinical staging IB--III and a histopathologic malignancy grading system have been compared in a retrospective study on 338 women with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The superiority of the grading system to staging was significant (p less than 0.01). However, staging had an additional prognostic value. Using both the malignancy grading system and clinical staging together provided a better capacity to predict the clinical outcome in individual patients. Prognostication according to clinical staging alone will result in a considerable loss of information.
在一项针对338例子宫颈浸润性鳞状细胞癌女性患者的回顾性研究中,对临床分期IB - III期和组织病理学恶性肿瘤分级系统的预后价值进行了比较。分级系统相对于分期的优越性显著(p < 0.01)。然而,分期具有额外的预后价值。同时使用恶性肿瘤分级系统和临床分期能够更好地预测个体患者的临床结局。仅根据临床分期进行预后评估会导致相当多的信息丢失。