• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessment of dependence potential of drugs in humans using multiple indices.

作者信息

Johanson C E, Kilgore K, Uhlenhuth E H

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1983;81(2):144-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00429009.

DOI:10.1007/BF00429009
PMID:6415745
Abstract

The study was designed to determine whether behavioral effects of amphetamine, which have been used to predict dependence potential, were stable after multiple exposures to the drug and whether these different indices of dependence potential were correlated. Ten normal human volunteers participated in a series of three identical choice experiments comparing 10 mg d-amphetamine and placebo. Each experiment consisted of nine sessions. During the first four sessions of each experiment, subjects alternately received amphetamine or placebo. During the next five sessions of each experiment, they were given a choice between amphetamine and placebo. Subjective effects were assessed using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) before drug was taken and 1, 3, and 6 h later. Liking scores were obtained after each session, as well as after each experiment. Subjects chose amphetamine an average of 3.9, 3.0, and 3.4 times out of five in the three experiments, in that order. Compared to placebo, amphetamine produced changes in mood as measured by the POMS including increased anxiety, vigor, friendliness, elation, arousal, and positive mood, and decreased fatigue. Liking scores for amphetamine were consistently higher than for placebo. Mood changes and liking scores produced by amphetamine were similar across all three experiments and across subjects. These results indicate that neither tolerance or increased sensitivity develops to the reinforcing properties of 10 mg d-amphetamine. The results are also discussed in terms of methods for predicting the dependence potential of psychotropic drugs and understanding the role of environmental context as a modulator of a drug's reinforcing effects.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessment of dependence potential of drugs in humans using multiple indices.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1983;81(2):144-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00429009.
2
Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine.人类的药物偏好与情绪:右旋苯丙胺
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(3):275-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00433062.
3
Drug preference and mood in humans: repeated assessment of d-amphetamine.人类的药物偏好与情绪:右旋苯丙胺的重复评估
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981 Feb;14(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90237-9.
4
Drug preference and mood in humans: diazepam.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(3):269-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00433061.
5
Drug preference and mood in humans: preference for d-amphetamine and subject characteristics.人类的药物偏好与情绪:对右旋苯丙胺的偏好及受试者特征
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1981;74(2):191-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00432692.
6
Drug preferences in humans.
Fed Proc. 1982 Feb;41(2):228-33.
7
Reinforcing and subjective effects of several anorectics in normal human volunteers.几种食欲抑制剂对正常人类志愿者的强化作用和主观效应。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Sep;242(3):777-83.
8
Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.主观反应预测健康志愿者对安非他命的选择。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 May;204:173158. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173158. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
9
Drug preference in normal volunteers: effects of age and time of day.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;87(2):186-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00431805.
10
Stress-induced changes in mood and cortisol release predict mood effects of amphetamine.压力引起的情绪变化和皮质醇释放可预测安非他命对情绪的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 1;109(1-3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.029. Epub 2010 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.主观反应预测健康志愿者对安非他命的选择。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 May;204:173158. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173158. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Stability of acute responses to drugs in humans across repeated testing: Findings with alcohol and amphetamine.人类对药物急性反应的稳定性在多次测试中的表现:酒精和安非他命的研究结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:107989. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107989. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
3
Evaluation of the "Pipeline" for Development of Medications for Cocaine Use Disorder: A Review of Translational Preclinical, Human Laboratory, and Clinical Trial Research.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug-induced mood changes in man. I. Observations on healthy subjects, chronically ill patients, and postaddicts.药物诱发的人类情绪变化。I. 对健康受试者、慢性病患者和戒毒者的观察。
J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Mar 19;157(12):1006-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02950290026009.
2
A comparative study of physiological and subjective effects of heroin and morphine administered intravenously in postaddicts.海洛因和吗啡静脉注射于戒毒者后生理及主观效应的比较研究。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1961 Sep;133:388-99.
3
Operant analysis of human heroin self-administration and the effects of naltrexone.
可卡因使用障碍药物研发“管道”评估:转化临床前、人体实验室及临床试验研究综述
Pharmacol Rev. 2016 Jul;68(3):533-62. doi: 10.1124/pr.115.011668.
4
Relationship between intranasal cocaine self-administration and subject-rated effects: predictors of cocaine taking on progressive-ratio schedules.鼻内可卡因自我给药与主观评定效应之间的关系:在累进比率程序下可卡因摄取的预测因素。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jul;29(4):342-50. doi: 10.1002/hup.2409. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?口服右旋苯丙胺自我给药与主观效应评分之间的关系:主观效应评分是否与药物摄取行为的渐进比率测量相对应?
Behav Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;24(5-6):533-42. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283645047.
6
Reinforcing effects of stimulants in humans: sensitivity of progressive-ratio schedules.兴奋剂对人类的强化作用:累进比率程序的敏感性
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Dec;16(6):503-12. doi: 10.1037/a0013657.
7
Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-amphetamine and sensation-seeking status.药物滥用易感性的个体差异:右旋苯丙胺与寻求刺激状态。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Nov;189(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0487-z. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
8
Assessing methylphenidate preference in ADHD patients using a choice procedure.使用选择程序评估多动症患者对哌甲酯的偏好。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Oct;175(4):391-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1838-2.
9
Interaction of expectancy and the pharmacological effects of d-amphetamine: subjective effects and self-administration.预期与右旋苯丙胺药理作用的相互作用:主观效应与自我给药。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jun;125(4):371-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02246020.
10
Factors influencing the reinforcing and subjective effects of ephedrine in humans.影响麻黄碱对人体强化作用及主观效应的因素。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jan;113(3-4):381-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02245213.
人类海洛因自我给药的操作性分析及纳曲酮的作用
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981 Jan;216(1):45-54.
4
Drug preference and mood in humans: repeated assessment of d-amphetamine.人类的药物偏好与情绪:右旋苯丙胺的重复评估
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981 Feb;14(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90237-9.
5
Drug preferences in humans.
Fed Proc. 1982 Feb;41(2):228-33.
6
Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine.人类的药物偏好与情绪:右旋苯丙胺
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(3):275-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00433062.
7
Drug preference and mood in humans: diazepam.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(3):269-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00433061.
8
The effects of two nonpharmacological variables on drug preference in humans.两个非药理学变量对人类药物偏好的影响。
NIDA Res Monogr. 1983 Apr;43:251-7.
9
Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance.影响苯丙胺耐受性发展的行为变量。
Psychopharmacologia. 1966;9(2):170-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00404721.
10
Operant drinking of alcohol on a rate-contingent ratio schedule of reinforcement.基于比率强化程序的操作性酒精摄入。
J Psychiatr Res. 1965 Oct;3(3):145-52. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(65)90024-5.