• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[正常受试者心率增加时Narula直接和估算窦房传导技术的比较]

[Comparison of Narula's technic of direct and estimated sinoatrial conduction at increasing rates in normal subjects].

作者信息

Padeletti L, Michelucci A, Fradella G A, Brat A, Monizzi D, Molino Lova R, Fantini F

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1984 Feb;77(2):155-60.

PMID:6424599
Abstract

Twenty eight normal subjects in sinus rhythm underwent direct measurement of sinoatrial conduction time (SACTD) by sinus node potential recordings (SNP) and indirect evaluation by Strauss (SACTS) and Narula's methods (SACTN) using the extrastimulus technique. Stimulation in Narula's method was undertaken at three different rates, 3, 6 and 9 beats per minute faster than the spontaneous rate of the subject (SACTN3, SACTN6, SACTN9). The mean values (+/- SD) were as follows: SACTD 84 +/- 18, SACTN3 85 +/- 29, SACTN6 96 +/- 33, SACTN9 101 +/- 36. The mean value of the SACTD was significantly lower than that of the SACTN9 (p less than 0,01) but there were no significant differences between SACTD and SACTN3 and SACTN6. The three values of the SACTN were closely related to each other but not to the values of the SACTD.

摘要

28名处于窦性心律的正常受试者接受了通过窦房结电位记录(SNP)直接测量窦房传导时间(SACTD),以及使用额外刺激技术通过施特劳斯法(SACTS)和纳鲁拉法(SACTN)进行间接评估。纳鲁拉法的刺激以比受试者自发心率快3、6和9次/分钟这三种不同速率进行(SACTN3、SACTN6、SACTN9)。平均值(±标准差)如下:SACTD 84±18,SACTN3 85±29,SACTN6 96±33,SACTN9 101±36。SACTD的平均值显著低于SACTN9(p<0.01),但SACTD与SACTN3和SACTN6之间无显著差异。SACTN的三个值彼此密切相关,但与SACTD的值无关。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of Narula's technic of direct and estimated sinoatrial conduction at increasing rates in normal subjects].[正常受试者心率增加时Narula直接和估算窦房传导技术的比较]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1984 Feb;77(2):155-60.
2
[Evaluation of the sinoauricular conduction time: comparison of the recording of the sinus potential and Narula's method].
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1983 Jan-Feb;32(1):1-5.
3
[Evaluation of sinoatrial conduction time by recording the sinus node potential. Comparison with indirect methods of evaluation].[通过记录窦房结电位评估窦房传导时间。与间接评估方法的比较]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1982 Nov;75(11):1233-9.
4
[Comparison of various indirect methods for evaluation of sinus function].[评估鼻窦功能的各种间接方法的比较]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1983 Jan;76(1):37-44.
5
Measurement of the sinoatrial conduction time using direct recording of sinus node electrogram. Preliminary study in normal subjects and comparison with the indirect methods.
G Ital Cardiol. 1982;12(1):52-8.
6
[Atrial stimulation and intranodal migration of sinus pacemaker in man (author's transl)].[人体心房刺激与窦房结起搏器的结内移位(作者译)]
G Ital Cardiol. 1981;11(9):1198-210.
7
The effects of atropine on sinoatrial conduction time directly measured from sinus node electrogram. A comparison with results furnished by indirect methods.
Eur Heart J. 1984 Jan;5(1):27-34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061548.
8
[Intra-sinus echo: demonstration using direct intracavitary recording of the sinus potential].
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1986 Aug;79(9):1337-42.
9
[Direct measurement of sinoatrial conduction time in man. Correlation with sinus cycle length].[人体窦房传导时间的直接测量。与窦性周期长度的相关性]
G Ital Cardiol. 1982;12(12):878-83.
10
[The reliability of Narula's technique for the evaluation of sino-atrial conduction time. Comparison with Strauss' technique and proposal of a new equation (author's transl)].[用于评估窦房传导时间的纳鲁拉技术的可靠性。与施特劳斯技术的比较及新公式的提出(作者译)]
G Ital Cardiol. 1980;10(3):290-300.