Suppr超能文献

[正常受试者心率增加时Narula直接和估算窦房传导技术的比较]

[Comparison of Narula's technic of direct and estimated sinoatrial conduction at increasing rates in normal subjects].

作者信息

Padeletti L, Michelucci A, Fradella G A, Brat A, Monizzi D, Molino Lova R, Fantini F

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1984 Feb;77(2):155-60.

PMID:6424599
Abstract

Twenty eight normal subjects in sinus rhythm underwent direct measurement of sinoatrial conduction time (SACTD) by sinus node potential recordings (SNP) and indirect evaluation by Strauss (SACTS) and Narula's methods (SACTN) using the extrastimulus technique. Stimulation in Narula's method was undertaken at three different rates, 3, 6 and 9 beats per minute faster than the spontaneous rate of the subject (SACTN3, SACTN6, SACTN9). The mean values (+/- SD) were as follows: SACTD 84 +/- 18, SACTN3 85 +/- 29, SACTN6 96 +/- 33, SACTN9 101 +/- 36. The mean value of the SACTD was significantly lower than that of the SACTN9 (p less than 0,01) but there were no significant differences between SACTD and SACTN3 and SACTN6. The three values of the SACTN were closely related to each other but not to the values of the SACTD.

摘要

28名处于窦性心律的正常受试者接受了通过窦房结电位记录(SNP)直接测量窦房传导时间(SACTD),以及使用额外刺激技术通过施特劳斯法(SACTS)和纳鲁拉法(SACTN)进行间接评估。纳鲁拉法的刺激以比受试者自发心率快3、6和9次/分钟这三种不同速率进行(SACTN3、SACTN6、SACTN9)。平均值(±标准差)如下:SACTD 84±18,SACTN3 85±29,SACTN6 96±33,SACTN9 101±36。SACTD的平均值显著低于SACTN9(p<0.01),但SACTD与SACTN3和SACTN6之间无显著差异。SACTN的三个值彼此密切相关,但与SACTD的值无关。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验