Dichter C R, Weinstein M C
Food Chem Toxicol. 1984 Jun;22(6):439-45. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(84)90326-0.
The cost-effectiveness of adopting aflatoxin tolerance levels of 15, 10 and 5 ppb for peanuts and peanut products was assessed. Estimates of the annual cost to manufacturers of monitoring and controlling peanut aflatoxin levels at the current 20-ppb action level, and estimates of the projected increase in costs of establishing lower tolerances were elicited from producers by questionnaire. Exposures to peanut products were derived from the HANES I survey and from peanut production statistics. The risk of liver cancer at each tolerance level was estimated using both epidemiological and extrapolated experimental data assuming that exposure would be reduced in direct proportion to the decrease in the tolerance. It was found that the 15-ppb tolerance would cost $60,000 per cancer death averted (range $20,000-$1,700,000) and is therefore relatively cost-effective. The marginal costs per life saved for both the 10-ppb and 5-ppb levels were found to be $1.7 million (range $0.6 million-$11.4 million) and $1.6 million (range +0.6 million-$31.1 million), respectively. Conclusions on the optimal regulatory approach should be guided by comparisons of these figures with corresponding cost-effectiveness ratios for alternative regulatory uses of national resources in the interests of public health.
评估了对花生及花生制品采用15 ppb、10 ppb和5 ppb黄曲霉毒素耐受水平的成本效益。通过问卷调查从生产商处获取了关于按照当前20 ppb行动水平监测和控制花生黄曲霉毒素水平的制造商年度成本估算,以及建立更低耐受水平预计增加成本的估算。花生制品的摄入量来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查第一轮(HANES I)以及花生生产统计数据。假设摄入量将与耐受水平的降低成正比减少,使用流行病学和外推实验数据估算了每个耐受水平下的肝癌风险。结果发现,采用15 ppb的耐受水平,每避免一例癌症死亡的成本为6万美元(范围为2万美元至170万美元),因此具有相对成本效益。对于10 ppb和5 ppb的耐受水平,每挽救一条生命的边际成本分别为170万美元(范围为60万美元至1140万美元)和160万美元(范围为60万美元至3110万美元)。关于最佳监管方法的结论应以将这些数字与为了公众健康而对国家资源进行其他监管用途的相应成本效益比进行比较为指导。