Kleyn D H, Trout J R
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1984 May-Jun;67(3):637-40.
Collaborators in 8 dairy and food industry laboratories performed one lactose determination on each of 8 unknown samples of milk, lowfat milk, or skim milk, as 3 pairs of blind duplicates. Two known samples were provided to gain experience prior to analysis of the unknown samples. All of the above samples were also analyzed for lactose content by the official AOAC gravimetric method (16.507) by a commercial laboratory. From the overall mean of results on all samples, determinations by the enzymatic method averaged 0.49% lower than by the AOAC method. This difference was significant by the t-test (P = 0.05), which indicated a lack of agreement between the compared methods in determining lactose content. Standard deviations were similar for the 3 sets of blind duplicates which ranged between 3.67 and 4.55% lactose content. F-values revealed that variations between means obtained by laboratories differed significantly as compared with variations within laboratory means. The method has been adopted official first action.
8家乳制品和食品行业实验室的合作人员对8份未知的牛奶、低脂牛奶或脱脂牛奶样品各进行了一次乳糖测定,共形成3对盲法双份样品。在分析未知样品之前,提供了2份已知样品以供获取经验。所有上述样品还由一家商业实验室采用官方AOAC重量法(16.507)分析乳糖含量。从所有样品结果的总体平均值来看,酶法测定结果平均比AOAC法低0.49%。通过t检验,这种差异具有显著性(P = 0.05),这表明在测定乳糖含量时,所比较的方法之间缺乏一致性。3组盲法双份样品的乳糖含量标准偏差相似,介于3.67%至4.55%之间。F值显示,与各实验室内部平均值的差异相比,各实验室获得的平均值之间的差异具有显著性。该方法已被官方首次采用。