Snell J J, Demello J V, Gardner P S, Kwantes W, Brooks R
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jul;37(7):796-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.7.796.
Four strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae were sent to UK participants in the UK National External Microbiological Quality Assessment Scheme, who were asked to examine the strains for toxin production by in vitro methods. Laboratories achieved 162/176 (92%) and 160/175 (91%) correct results with two rapid toxin producers and 145/175 (82%) with a slow toxin producer. With a non-toxigenic strain 26/175 (15%) laboratories reported toxin production. Of the 173 laboratories reporting on all four strains, only 120 (69%) achieved the correct result for all. There was no significant association between the use of various methods and results, with the exception that laboratories using a full set of positive, weak positive, and negative controls made fewer errors than those not using controls. A number of unsatisfactory practices were revealed by the trial, however, and recommendations on preparation of inoculum, media, peptones, animal sera, and use of controls are made.
四株白喉棒状杆菌被送往参与英国国家外部微生物质量评估计划的英国参与者,要求他们通过体外方法检测这些菌株是否产生毒素。对于两株快速产毒素菌株,各实验室得出正确结果的比例分别为162/176(92%)和160/175(91%);对于一株缓慢产毒素菌株,得出正确结果的比例为145/175(82%)。对于一株不产毒素的菌株,有26/175(15%)的实验室报告产毒素。在报告检测所有四株菌株的173个实验室中,只有120个(69%)对所有菌株都得出了正确结果。除了使用全套阳性、弱阳性和阴性对照的实验室比未使用对照的实验室出错更少外,各种方法的使用与结果之间没有显著关联。不过,该试验揭示了一些不尽人意的操作情况,并针对接种物、培养基、蛋白胨、动物血清的制备以及对照的使用提出了建议。