Copplestone A, Roath S
Acta Haematol. 1984;71(6):376-80. doi: 10.1159/000206622.
The control achieved in two anticoagulant clinics over 1 year was studied. The result of 430 patient years of treatment in 732 patients was assessed. Overall, the patients were maintained in the therapeutic range (British ratio 2.0-4.0) 85% of the time, 'under-anticoagulated' 10% and 'overtreated' 5% of the time. Patients on long-term treatment had better control than those on short-term treatment (87 and 72% of time in therapeutic range, respectively). Short-term patients were 'undertreated' one quarter of the time. Assessment of the percentage of time individual patients spent within the therapeutic range was a useful index: 77% short-term patients and 99% long-term patients were controlled more than half the time; and 30% short-term plus 40% long-term patients were controlled all the time. Two complementary methods of assessing therapeutic control are used. The standard of control compares favourably with other reports, but shows areas where improvements can be made. For assessment of clinical benefit from anticoagulants, close quality control of treatment by such methods is essential.
对两家抗凝门诊在1年多时间里实现的控制情况进行了研究。评估了732例患者430患者年的治疗结果。总体而言,患者在治疗范围内(英国比值2.0 - 4.0)的时间占85%,“抗凝不足”的时间占10%,“治疗过度”的时间占5%。长期治疗的患者比短期治疗的患者控制情况更好(分别有87%和72%的时间处于治疗范围内)。短期患者有四分之一的时间“治疗不足”。评估个体患者处于治疗范围内的时间百分比是一个有用的指标:77%的短期患者和99%的长期患者超过一半的时间得到了控制;30%的短期患者加40%的长期患者一直得到了控制。采用了两种互补的方法来评估治疗控制情况。控制标准与其他报告相比具有优势,但也显示出可以改进的方面。为了评估抗凝剂的临床益处,通过此类方法进行密切的治疗质量控制至关重要。