Poller L, Wright D, Rowlands M
Withington Hospital, Manchester.
J Clin Pathol. 1993 Apr;46(4):299-303. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.4.299.
To compare the effectiveness of three computerised systems that are currently used for assisting warfarin control in outpatients with the customary dosing method used by experienced medical staff.
A pilot randomised study of three systems with a follow up independently randomised study of two of these was made on 186 patients receiving long term treatment or who had recently started warfarin treatment and had been discharged from hospital.
All three computerised systems seemed to give satisfactory control compared with the traditional dosing method. For patients receiving more intensive treatment with an assigned target range of 3.0-4.5 computerised dosage programs achieved significantly better control; the medical staff undertreated such patients almost 50% of the time.
Computer based programs can assist outpatient anticoagulant control with warfarin during both early and long term treatment. For most patients the control achieved is as good as that obtained by the customary method of dosing, by experienced clinic doctors, although the latter tend to be too conservative when dosing patients within the intense target range of 3.0 to 4.5 International Normalised Ratio (INR). The computers were significantly more successful in this higher range.
比较目前用于协助门诊患者华法林治疗管理的三种计算机系统与经验丰富的医务人员使用的传统给药方法的有效性。
对186例接受长期治疗或最近开始华法林治疗且已出院的患者进行了一项三种系统的初步随机研究,并对其中两种系统进行了独立随机随访研究。
与传统给药方法相比,所有三种计算机系统似乎都能提供令人满意的治疗管理。对于目标范围设定为3.0 - 4.5的强化治疗患者,计算机给药程序实现了显著更好的治疗管理;医务人员在近50%的时间里对这类患者治疗不足。
基于计算机的程序可在华法林早期和长期治疗期间协助门诊抗凝管理。对于大多数患者,实现的治疗管理与经验丰富的临床医生采用的传统给药方法一样好,尽管后者在国际标准化比值(INR)为3.0至4.5的强化目标范围内给药时往往过于保守。在这个较高范围内,计算机的效果明显更好。