Stott N C, Fraser R C, Morrell D C
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1198-200. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1198.
Regional advisers, faculty secretaries of the Royal College of General Practitioners, heads of academic departments of general practice and primary care, and heads of RCGP research units were invited to complete a semistructured questionnaire to determine the nature and availability of current sources of advice for general practitioners participating in research activities and the demands placed on the available sources in the United Kingdom. The principal source for research advice was university departments of general practice, yet these have insufficient resources to cope with requests and few have spare capacity to stimulate research. Regional advisers and faculty secretaries do not seem to be kindling a spirit of inquiry and they seem somewhat complacent about both the lack of requests for research advice from general practitioners and the difficulties of academic departments. Proper development of research capability in general practice and primary care is unlikely to occur without more resources to create training posts in academic departments and a greater spirit of inquiry in vocational training programmes, which should lead to both review (audit) and research.
地区顾问、皇家全科医师学院的教员秘书、全科医学与初级保健学术部门负责人以及皇家全科医师学院研究单位负责人受邀填写一份半结构化问卷，以确定目前为参与研究活动的全科医生提供建议的来源的性质和可获得性，以及英国对现有来源的需求。研究建议的主要来源是大学的全科医学系，但这些系资源不足，无法应对各种请求，而且很少有多余的能力来推动研究。地区顾问和教员秘书似乎没有激发探究精神，他们对全科医生缺乏研究建议请求以及学术部门的困难似乎有些自满。如果没有更多资源在学术部门设立培训岗位，以及职业培训项目中缺乏更强烈的探究精神，全科医学和初级保健研究能力的适当发展不太可能实现，而这应该会带来评估（审计）和研究。
