Suppr超能文献

阿芬太尼用于麻醉诱导的临床经验;与硫喷妥钠的比较。

Clinical experience with alfentanil for induction of anaesthesia; a comparison with thiopentone.

作者信息

Palazzo M G, Taylor S, Strunin L

出版信息

Can Anaesth Soc J. 1984 Sep;31(5):517-22. doi: 10.1007/BF03009536.

Abstract

Alfentanil, a new short-acting narcotic was clinically evaluated as an intravenous anaesthetic induction agent in 19 patients and compared to 20 patients receiving thiopentone. Alfentanil was superior to thiopentone in cardiovascular stability, both during induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. However, alfentanil does not behave like a typical induction agent, time to unconsciousness is longer and more variable and is often accompanied by muscle rigidity. The results of this study suggest that alfentanil is more difficult to use as an induction agent than thiopentone, but alfentanil is recommended for short procedures when haemodynamic stability is important.

摘要

阿芬太尼是一种新型短效麻醉剂,对19例患者进行了临床评估,将其作为静脉麻醉诱导剂,并与20例接受硫喷妥钠的患者进行了比较。在麻醉诱导和气管插管期间,阿芬太尼在心血管稳定性方面优于硫喷妥钠。然而,阿芬太尼的表现并不像典型的诱导剂,意识消失时间更长且更具变异性,并且常伴有肌肉强直。本研究结果表明,阿芬太尼作为诱导剂比硫喷妥钠更难使用,但在血流动力学稳定性很重要的短时间手术中,推荐使用阿芬太尼。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验