Suppr超能文献

[通过多普勒信号频谱分析评估颈动脉狭窄程度。频谱分析、血管造影及解剖病理学结果的比较]

[Evaluation of the degree of carotid stenosis by spectral analysis of the Doppler signal. Comparison of the results of spectral analysis, angiography and anatomo-pathology].

作者信息

Arbeille P, Lapierre F, Patat F, Benhamou A C, Alison D, Dusorbier C, Pourcelot L

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1984 Oct;77(10):1097-107.

PMID:6439145
Abstract

With the single Doppler spectrum analysis, one can appreciate the degree of the carotid stenosis according to the importance of the haemodynamic disturbances induced by the stenosis. The purpose of our study is to show the possibilities and the limitations of this method. Spectrum disturbances were classified in 5 grades, each of them being related to the importance of the stenosis. The degree of stenosis has been evaluated by the C.W. Doppler spectrum analysis, the angiographies and the anatomical study of the endarteriectomies. We considered that we had a perfect concordance between the results of the different methods when the degree of stenosis measured on the angiographies or on the endarteriectomies was compatible with the spectrum analysis classification: grade I: stenosis inferior to 40% (in area), 23% (in diameter); grade II: stenosis ranging between 40 and 60% in area (23 and 40 in diameter); grade III: stenosis of 60 to 75% in area (40 to 50% in diameter) and of particular shape (extended plaque); grade IV: stenosis ranging between 60 and 90% in area (40 to 70% in diameter); grade V: stenosis higher than 90% in area (70% in diameter). The confrontation of spectrum analysis and angiographic date concerns 58 bifurcations. We got a perfect correlation in 93% of the cases. The confrontation of the spectrum analysis method and the anatomical study of the endarteriectomies concerns 38 bifurcations. We got a perfect correlation in 92% of the cases. The appreciation of the carotid stenosis degree is now performed in routine at the Hospital. For some patients, the endarteriectomy has been decided from the clinical and the spectrum analysis data, and an electro-encephalogram with compression. However these date are generally completed with an angiography with venous punction.

摘要

通过单普勒频谱分析,可根据狭窄引起的血流动力学紊乱的严重程度来评估颈动脉狭窄程度。我们研究的目的是展示这种方法的可能性和局限性。频谱紊乱分为5级,每一级都与狭窄的严重程度相关。狭窄程度通过连续波多普勒频谱分析、血管造影以及动脉内膜切除术的解剖学研究来评估。当血管造影或动脉内膜切除术中测量的狭窄程度与频谱分析分类相符时,我们认为不同方法的结果具有完美的一致性:I级:狭窄面积小于40%(直径小于23%);II级:狭窄面积在40%至60%之间(直径在23%至40%之间);III级:狭窄面积为60%至75%(直径为40%至50%)且形状特殊(斑块延伸);IV级:狭窄面积在60%至90%之间(直径在40%至70%之间);V级:狭窄面积大于90%(直径大于70%)。频谱分析与血管造影数据的对比涉及58个分叉。在93%的病例中我们得到了完美的相关性。频谱分析方法与动脉内膜切除术的解剖学研究的对比涉及38个分叉。在92%的病例中我们得到了完美的相关性。目前在医院常规进行颈动脉狭窄程度的评估。对于一些患者,根据临床和频谱分析数据决定进行动脉内膜切除术,并进行压迫脑电图检查。然而,这些数据通常会通过静脉穿刺血管造影来完善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验