• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高压氧氦气对细菌体外对抗菌药物反应的影响。

Effect of hyperbaric oxyhelium gas on response of bacteria to antimicrobial agents in vitro.

作者信息

Kenward M A, Alcock S R, McKay I C

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Dec;26(6):833-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.6.833.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.26.6.833
PMID:6441512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC180034/
Abstract

Modern diving techniques can require the treatment of infection in an atmosphere of pressurized oxyhelium gas. The antibiotic susceptibility of 16 species and strains (eight genera) of gram-negative bacilli and 3 species and strains (two genera) of gram-positive cocci to each of 21 antimicrobial agents was assessed in air at atmospheric pressure and in oxyhelium gas at an absolute pressure of 7 bar (ca. 709 kPa). A disk diffusion technique was employed, and significantly different results were obtained in the two atmospheres. The effect of oxyhelium on diameters of growth inhibition varied significantly with the bacterium and with the antibiotic and was particularly marked with certain bacterium-antibiotic combinations. The gram-negative bacilli generally gave reduced zone diameters in oxyhelium, whereas the gram-positive cocci showed a mixture of effects.

摘要

现代潜水技术可能需要在加压的氧氦气体环境中治疗感染。评估了16种革兰氏阴性杆菌(8个属)和3种革兰氏阳性球菌(2个属)对21种抗菌剂在常压空气中以及在绝对压力为7巴(约709千帕)的氧氦气体中的抗生素敏感性。采用纸片扩散法,在两种环境中获得了显著不同的结果。氧氦对生长抑制直径的影响因细菌和抗生素而异,在某些细菌 - 抗生素组合中尤为明显。革兰氏阴性杆菌在氧氦环境中通常抑菌圈直径减小,而革兰氏阳性球菌则表现出多种不同的效应。

相似文献

1
Effect of hyperbaric oxyhelium gas on response of bacteria to antimicrobial agents in vitro.高压氧氦气对细菌体外对抗菌药物反应的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Dec;26(6):833-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.6.833.
2
The effect of antibiotics on bacteria under hyperbaric conditions.高压条件下抗生素对细菌的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Feb;37(2):253-63. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.2.253.
3
Interactions of helium, oxygen, and nitrous oxide affecting bacterial growth.氦气、氧气和一氧化二氮对细菌生长的相互作用。
Undersea Biomed Res. 1978 Jun;5(2):189-98.
4
Trends in bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents.细菌对抗菌药物的敏感性趋势。
Chemotherapy. 1985;31(6):433-9. doi: 10.1159/000238371.
5
In vitro susceptibility of gram-positive cocci to paldimycin.革兰氏阳性球菌对帕地霉素的体外敏感性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Jan;31(1):104-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.1.104.
6
Exposure of mice to a helium-oxygen atmosphere at pressure to 122 atmospheres.
J Appl Physiol. 1967 Apr;22(4):694-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1967.22.4.694.
7
Post-antibiotic growth suppression of linezolid against Gram-positive bacteria.利奈唑胺对革兰氏阳性菌的抗生素后生长抑制作用。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Jun;47(6):879-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.6.879.
8
[Sensitivity of bacteria isolated from non-parenteral drugs to antibiotics. II. Sensitivity of gram-positive strains].[从非注射用药物中分离出的细菌对抗生素的敏感性。II. 革兰氏阳性菌株的敏感性]
Acta Pol Pharm. 1981;38(1):123-8.
9
Antimicrobial activity of fusidic acid and disk diffusion susceptibility testing criteria for gram-positive cocci.夫西地酸的抗菌活性及革兰氏阳性球菌的纸片扩散法药敏试验标准
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jul;33(7):1712-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1712-1715.1995.
10
In vitro activity of teichomycin A 2 in comparison with penicillin and vancomycin against gram-positive cocci.替考霉素A2与青霉素和万古霉素相比对革兰氏阳性球菌的体外活性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Oct;1(5):278-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02019971.

引用本文的文献

1
The composition of the human fecal microbiota might be significantly associated with fecal SCFA levels under hyperbaric conditions.在高压条件下,人类粪便微生物群的组成可能与粪便短链脂肪酸水平显著相关。
Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2021;40(4):168-175. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.2020-054. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
2
Oxybiotest project: microorganisms under pressure. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and simple pressure interaction on selected bacteria.氧生物测试项目:压力下的微生物。高压氧(HBO)与特定细菌的简单压力相互作用。
Med Gas Res. 2012 Sep 11;2(1):24. doi: 10.1186/2045-9912-2-24.
3
The impact of conventional and laparoscopic colon resection (CO2 or helium) on intraperitoneal adhesion formation in a rat peritonitis model.传统与腹腔镜结肠切除术(二氧化碳或氦气)对大鼠腹膜炎模型腹腔粘连形成的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Apr;15(4):380-6. doi: 10.1007/s004640000359. Epub 2001 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF HYPERBARIC OXYGEN ON BACTERIA AND FUNGI.
Lancet. 1963 Nov 16;2(7316):1040-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)90011-4.
2
Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on the growth and properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Microbios. 1980;28(111):47-60.
3
Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on microorganisms.高压氧对微生物的影响。
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1971;25:111-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.000551.
4
Effect of elevated atmospheric pressure on antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes.大气压力升高对金黄色葡萄球菌和化脓性链球菌抗生素敏感性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Jun;1(6):512-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.1.6.512.
5
Effect of elevated atmospheric pressure on penicillin binding by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes.大气压力升高对金黄色葡萄球菌和化脓性链球菌青霉素结合的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Feb;3(2):147-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.2.147.
6
Effect of hyperbaric atmospheres on -galactoside transport in Escherichia coli.
Can J Microbiol. 1972 Jul;18(7):1162-4. doi: 10.1139/m72-179.
7
Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study.抗生素敏感性试验。一项国际合作研究报告。
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1971;217:Suppl 217:1+.
8
Synergism between hyperoxia and antibiotics for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.高氧与抗生素对铜绿假单胞菌的协同作用。
Appl Microbiol. 1968 Feb;16(2):260-2. doi: 10.1128/am.16.2.260-262.1968.
9
Effect of helium gas at elevated pressure on iron transport and growth of Escherichia coli.高压氦气对大肠杆菌铁转运和生长的影响。
J Bacteriol. 1974 Jan;117(1):170-4. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.1.170-174.1974.
10
Acute otitis externa in divers working in the North Sea: a microbiological survey of seven saturation dives.北海潜水员的急性外耳道炎:七次饱和潜水的微生物学调查
J Hyg (Lond). 1977 Jun;78(3):395-409. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400056291.