Hauck W W, Martin A O
Genet Epidemiol. 1984;1(4):383-400. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370010410.
We have been investigating cancer patterns in the Hutterites, a religious isolate residing on communal farms [Martin et al, 1980a,b,c]. Advantages of this population include extensive and accurate genealogies, essentially complete case ascertainment, and relatively uniform environmental background with regard to geographic location, lifestyle, and diet. However, application of the common epidemiological approach to familial risk assessment based on incidence in relatives of index cases [Haenszel, 1959] posed difficulties because all cases are probands. We also planned to employ matching to control for important confounders and thus had to deal with the problems of the matching of cases and controls as well as the existence of complex inbreeding [Hauck and Martin, 1982]. Our basic approach was to compare coefficients of kinship (Fm, a measure of coancestry) of cases with each other to coefficients between cases and matched controls drawn from the same population. We have developed a paired t-type statistic to assess the significance of observed differences. We present, as examples, application of our methods to the analysis of Hutterite data on neurofibromatosis, known to be inherited in autosomal dominant fashion, and on cancer. Neurofibromatosis showed significant familial aggregation, as expected. Breast, colon-rectal, and stomach cancer did not. We then show how to evaluate power and to determine appropriate sample sizes for detecting specified increases in kinship.
我们一直在研究哈特派信徒中的癌症模式,哈特派是居住在公社农场的一个宗教隔离群体[马丁等人,1980a、b、c]。该人群的优势包括广泛而准确的族谱、基本完整的病例确诊,以及在地理位置、生活方式和饮食方面相对统一的环境背景。然而,基于索引病例亲属发病率的常见流行病学方法在家族风险评估中的应用[海恩斯尔,1959]存在困难,因为所有病例都是先证者。我们还计划采用匹配来控制重要的混杂因素,因此必须处理病例与对照的匹配问题以及复杂近亲繁殖的存在[豪克和马丁,1982]。我们的基本方法是将病例之间的亲属系数(Fm,一种共同祖先的度量)与来自同一人群的病例和匹配对照之间的系数进行比较。我们开发了一种配对t型统计量来评估观察到的差异的显著性。我们举例说明我们的方法在分析哈特派关于神经纤维瘤病(已知以常染色体显性方式遗传)和癌症的数据中的应用。正如预期的那样,神经纤维瘤病显示出显著的家族聚集性。乳腺癌、结直肠癌和胃癌则没有。然后我们展示如何评估检验效能以及确定用于检测亲属系数特定增加的合适样本量。