Moore S A, Peterson R G, Felten D L, O'Connor B L
J Neurol Sci. 1980 Oct;48(1):133-52. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(80)90156-2.
Motor and sensory conduction velocities were measured in the sural and tibial nerves of streptozotocin (stz)-diabetic, alloxan-diabetic, and age-matched control rats. Conduction velocity (CV) determinations were made 2 weeks and 2, 4, 8, and 12 months following the induction of diabetes. CVs of control, stz-diabetic, and alloxan-diabetic rats were compared at each time period by one way analysis of variance and when appropriate by the Newman-Keuls multiple range test for multiple comparisons. Reductions of 10-20% in CV of diabetic rats were observed in several classes of sensory and motor nerve fibers. Larger reductions (31 and 38%) were seen in 2 classes of sensory nerve fibers in 12 month stz-diabetic rats. Sensory CV was slowed earlier and more frequently than motor CV. Differential involvement was also seen among the several classes of sensory nerve fibers examined. Slower conducting sensory fibers appeared to be affected earlier and more frequently than faster conducting sensory fibers. Comparing alloxan-diabetic with stz-diabetic rats revealed significant differences in CV 8 months after the induction of diabetes. Motor and sensory CVs of the tibial nerve were slower in stz-diabetic rats than in alloxan-diabetic rats. In general, the neuropathy appeared to be less severe and to develop later in the alloxan-diabetic rats. These data suggest that the neuropathy of stz- and alloxan-diabetes is primarily sensory in nature, and that the neuropathy in these 2 widely used models of diabetes may not be entirely equivalent.
在链脲佐菌素(STZ)诱导的糖尿病大鼠、四氧嘧啶诱导的糖尿病大鼠以及年龄匹配的对照大鼠的腓肠神经和胫神经中测量运动和感觉传导速度。在诱导糖尿病后的2周以及2、4、8和12个月进行传导速度(CV)测定。通过单因素方差分析在每个时间段比较对照大鼠、STZ诱导的糖尿病大鼠和四氧嘧啶诱导的糖尿病大鼠的CV,并在适当情况下通过纽曼-基尔斯多重范围检验进行多重比较。在几类感觉和运动神经纤维中观察到糖尿病大鼠的CV降低了10-20%。在12个月大的STZ诱导的糖尿病大鼠的两类感觉神经纤维中观察到更大幅度的降低(31%和38%)。感觉CV比运动CV更早且更频繁地减慢。在所检查的几类感觉神经纤维中也观察到了差异受累情况。传导较慢的感觉纤维似乎比传导较快的感觉纤维更早且更频繁地受到影响。比较四氧嘧啶诱导的糖尿病大鼠和STZ诱导的糖尿病大鼠发现,糖尿病诱导8个月后CV存在显著差异。STZ诱导的糖尿病大鼠胫神经的运动和感觉CV比四氧嘧啶诱导的糖尿病大鼠慢。一般来说,四氧嘧啶诱导的糖尿病大鼠的神经病变似乎不那么严重且发展较晚。这些数据表明,STZ和四氧嘧啶糖尿病的神经病变主要是感觉性的,并且在这两种广泛使用的糖尿病模型中,神经病变可能并不完全相同。