ten Hoopen G, Vos J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Apr;7(2):342-55. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.7.2.342.
The present study investigates the process of auditory attention switching by means of experiments in which observers counted the number of monaurally and interaurally presented clicks. Several studies have reported that the number of interaurally presented events was underestimated relative to monaurally presented ones. Ten Hoopen and Vos, however, could not replicate this phenomenon. The data from Experiment 1 demonstrate that such a discrepancy is caused by the different orders in which the monaural and interaural sequences were presented. With blocked presentation, interaural sequences were counted less well than monaural sequences, whereas there was no difference when all sequence types were randomized. An attention-switching mechanism was proposed to account for performance on interaural sequences during blocked presentation. In the random case observers presumably did not switch their attention to and fro, but "multiplexed" the channels. Experiment 2 investigated whether observers can deliberately suppress the process of attention switching when confronted with blocked interaural sequences. The results show that they cannot, which suggests that attention switching is an automatic process.
本研究通过实验来探究听觉注意力转换的过程,在这些实验中,观察者要数单耳和双耳呈现的滴答声的数量。几项研究报告称,相对于单耳呈现的事件数量,双耳呈现的事件数量被低估了。然而,滕胡彭和沃斯未能重复这一现象。实验1的数据表明,这种差异是由单耳和双耳序列呈现的不同顺序造成的。在分组呈现时,双耳序列的计数不如单耳序列,而当所有序列类型随机化时则没有差异。有人提出了一种注意力转换机制来解释分组呈现期间双耳序列的表现。在随机情况下,观察者大概不会来回切换注意力,而是对通道进行“多路复用”。实验2研究了观察者在面对分组的双耳序列时是否能够有意抑制注意力转换过程。结果表明他们不能,这表明注意力转换是一个自动过程。