ten Hoopen G, Boelaarts L, Gruisen A, Apon I, Donders K, Mul N, Akerboom S
Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jul;56(1):110-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03211694.
Nakao and Axelrod (1976) and van Noorden (1975) showed that the threshold for discriminating an anisochronous duple rhythm (a series of clicks with a temporal offset on every other one) from an isochronous rhythm (no offset) is poorer when the clicks are presented alternately to the two ears than when they are presented to the same ears. Van Noorden reported that the difference between the thresholds in the alternating and nonalternating conditions varied with the tempo of the sequence. Nakao and Axelrod found invariance of this threshold difference with sequence speed. According to our quantification of temporal processing of interaural sequences, the latter result should be expected. We carried out five psychophysical experiments to establish interaural and monaural discrimination between isochronous and anisochronous rhythms. Across experiments, base time intervals of 60-720 msec were spanned. The main result was that we replicated the poorer discrimination for interaural sequences. This deterioration in discrimination was the same for all sequence speeds. It was also the case that the thresholds were almost constant up to a sound repetition rate of about 3 per second, but increased linearly with slower rates. This result supports evidence in the literature that temporal processing of sequences faster than about 3-4 sounds per second differs from temporal processing of slower sequences.
中尾和阿克塞尔罗德(1976年)以及范诺登(1975年)表明,当点击声交替呈现给两只耳朵时,与等时节奏(无时间偏移)相比,区分不等时双节奏(每隔一个点击声有时间偏移的一系列点击声)的阈值要比点击声呈现给同一只耳朵时更差。范诺登报告说,交替和非交替条件下阈值之间的差异随序列的节奏而变化。中尾和阿克塞尔罗德发现这种阈值差异与序列速度无关。根据我们对双耳序列时间处理的量化,应该预期会得到后一个结果。我们进行了五项心理物理学实验,以确定等时和不等时节奏之间的双耳和单耳辨别能力。在各项实验中,基本时间间隔跨度为60 - 720毫秒。主要结果是,我们重复验证了双耳序列辨别能力较差这一现象。对于所有序列速度,这种辨别能力的下降都是相同的。同样的情况是,在声音重复率约为每秒3次之前,阈值几乎是恒定的,但随着速度变慢而呈线性增加。这一结果支持了文献中的证据,即每秒超过约3 - 4个声音的序列的时间处理与较慢序列的时间处理不同。