Suppr超能文献

慢性中耳积液中的免疫球蛋白E:RIST、PRIST和RIA技术的比较。

Immunoglobulin E in chronic middle ear effusions: conmparison of RIST, PRIST, and RIA techniques.

作者信息

Lewis D M, Schram J L, Lim D J, Birck H G, Gleich G

出版信息

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1978 Mar-Apr;87(2 Pt 1):197-201. doi: 10.1177/000348947808700209.

Abstract

To investigate the possible role of allergy in otitis media with effusion (OME), the immunoglobulin E (IgE) content of 138 middle ear effusions (MEE) and paired serum samples from patients with chronic otitis media with effusion was determined. The initial 62 paired specimens were assayed for IgE by the radioimmunosorbent test (RIST), while the later 76 paired specimens were assayed for IgE by the paper radioimmunosorbent test (PRIST). When the results obtained by these two techniques were compared, it was noted that the PRIST procedure gave significantly lower IgE values for effusions than the RIST method. When the effusion-to-serum ratios (E/S ratios) were computed from the PRIST data, the E/S ratio was less than one, while RIST data gave an E/S ratio greater than one. The results obtained with the PRIST procedure were confirmed by double antibody radioimmunoassay for IgE. Thus, the PRIST procedure appears to measure the IgE content of MEE more accurately, and the results obtained by this procedure fail to support the concept of allergy as a major causative factor in OME.

摘要

为了研究变态反应在分泌性中耳炎(OME)中可能发挥的作用,测定了138例分泌性中耳炎患者中耳积液(MEE)及配对血清样本中的免疫球蛋白E(IgE)含量。最初的62对样本采用放射免疫吸附试验(RIST)检测IgE,而后来的76对样本则采用纸放射免疫吸附试验(PRIST)检测IgE。比较这两种技术所获结果时,发现PRIST法测得的积液IgE值显著低于RIST法。根据PRIST数据计算积液与血清比值(E/S比值)时,E/S比值小于1,而RIST数据得出的E/S比值大于1。IgE的双抗体放射免疫测定证实了PRIST法所获结果。因此,PRIST法似乎能更准确地测定MEE中的IgE含量,且该方法所获结果不支持变态反应是OME主要致病因素这一观点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验