Suppr超能文献

400例疑似脑和颈脊髓疾病患者的CT与磁共振成像对比研究

Comparison of CT and MR in 400 patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord.

作者信息

Bradley W G, Waluch V, Yadley R A, Wycoff R R

出版信息

Radiology. 1984 Sep;152(3):695-702. doi: 10.1148/radiology.152.3.6463251.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MR) (0.35 T) and computed tomography (CT) were compared in 400 consecutive patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord. Of 325 positive diagnoses, MR detected abnormality while CT was normal in 93; MR was more specific in 68; MR and CT gave equivalent information in 129; CT was more specific in 32; and CT was positive while MR was normal in 3. MR was superior to CT in detection of multiple sclerosis, subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy, posterior fossa infarcts and tumors, small extra-axial fluid collections, and cervical syringomyelia. CT was preferable in evaluation of meningiomas and separation of tumor from edema. Using available sequence parameters, MR missed 3 1-cm calcified meningiomas which were clearly seen on CT. CT takes less time and may be preferable in patients with acute trauma as well as very young or elderly individuals. Thus the two studies should be considered complementary.

摘要

对400例连续的疑似脑和颈脊髓疾病患者进行了磁共振成像(MR)(0.35T)和计算机断层扫描(CT)检查并比较。在325例阳性诊断中,MR检测到异常而CT正常的有93例;MR更具特异性的有68例;MR和CT提供等效信息的有129例;CT更具特异性的有32例;CT阳性而MR正常的有3例。在检测多发性硬化症、皮质下动脉硬化性脑病、后颅窝梗死和肿瘤、小的轴外液体积聚以及颈段脊髓空洞症方面,MR优于CT。在评估脑膜瘤以及区分肿瘤与水肿方面,CT更可取。利用现有的序列参数,MR漏诊了3例1cm的钙化脑膜瘤,而这些在CT上清晰可见。CT所需时间更少,对于急性创伤患者以及非常年轻或年长的个体可能更可取。因此,这两项检查应被视为互补。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验