Mascellino M T, Prignano G, Lorenzi A, Iegri F, Catania S, Lancia O, Sorice F
Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1984 May 31;63(2):104-10.
We present the results of sensitivity of 191 Gram-negative bacteria towards the following antibiotics: aminoglycosides (amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin), cephalosporines (moxalactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime) and piperacilline obtained by agar diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) versus automatic system MS 2 Abbott. Essential accord expressed in percentage is for amikacin 96%, for gentamicin 93%, for moxalactam 91%, for tobramycin 95%, for cefotaxime 92%, for piperacilline 89%, for netilmicin 90%, for ceftazidime 92. Full accord gives more discrepant results especially for cephalosporins. For aminoglycosides no significative differences were observed between the two methods. For cephalosporins the incidence of discordance was a little more high. A better sensitivity was obtained by Kirby-Bauer method versus automatic system, which can be considered a therapeutical tool as it furnishes rapidly (4 hours) MIC values, useful to establish antibiotic doses.
我们展示了191株革兰氏阴性菌对以下抗生素的敏感性结果:氨基糖苷类(阿米卡星、庆大霉素、妥布霉素、奈替米星)、头孢菌素类(拉氧头孢、头孢噻肟、头孢他啶)以及哌拉西林,采用琼脂扩散法(Kirby-Bauer)与雅培自动系统MS 2进行对比。以百分比表示的基本一致性为:阿米卡星96%、庆大霉素93%、拉氧头孢91%、妥布霉素95%、头孢噻肟92%、哌拉西林89%、奈替米星90%、头孢他啶92%。完全一致的情况给出了更不一致的结果,尤其是对于头孢菌素类。对于氨基糖苷类,两种方法之间未观察到显著差异。对于头孢菌素类,不一致的发生率略高。与自动系统相比,Kirby-Bauer方法获得了更好的敏感性,自动系统可被视为一种治疗工具,因为它能快速(4小时)提供MIC值,有助于确定抗生素剂量。