Fardin V, Oliveras J L, Besson J M
Brain Res. 1984 Jul 23;306(1-2):125-39. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90361-5.
This study consists of a detailed analysis of the analgesic effects induced by stimulation of the various parts of the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) in the freely moving rat. In order to characterize the analgesia, two criteria are considered: (1) the evaluation of the degree of analgesia and behavioral side effects evoked during central stimulation; and (2) the presence of post-effects. Central stimulation (50 Hz sine waves) was delivered via bipolar concentric electrodes and analgesia was quantified by the change in the vocalization threshold induced by electrical stimulation of the tail. Within the ventral PAG, the vocalization threshold increased gradually with the intensity of the central stimulation, the degree of analgesia generally being powerful. There was no relationship between the strength of the analgesic effects and the motor disturbances also produced by stimulation of this region. Antinociceptive effects generally disappeared when the stimulation ceased. Only when the intensity of the stimulation was strong enough to induce very powerful analgesic effects were post-stimulation analgesic effects noticed. Within the dorsal and dorsolateral PAG as well as in the ventral region just surrounding the aqueduct, analgesia appeared suddenly, was generally less pronounced and was always concomitant with strong aversive reactions. In contrast with the analgesia from the ventral PAG, marked post-effects were observed. These latter characteristics were also obtained from stimulation of regions located outside the PAG (colliculi, intercollicular commissure and tectum adjacent to the dorsolateral PAG) although these zones were not extensively studied. By consideration of various data in the literature, it is concluded from this study, which clearly distinguishes stimulation-produced-analgesia (SPA) from ventral PAG versus dorsal PAG, that analgesia induced from this midbrain area involves at least two different neuronal substrates. Whilst the ventral PAG seems to be more preferentially involved in pain modulation, the authenticity of 'analgesia' triggered by stimulation of aversive regions (which are widely spread over the PAG) is questioned and proposals to explain the simultaneous appearance of analgesic effects and aversion are considered.
本研究包括对自由活动大鼠中脑导水管周围灰质(PAG)各部位刺激所诱导的镇痛作用进行详细分析。为了表征镇痛效果,考虑了两个标准:(1)评估中枢刺激期间诱发的镇痛程度和行为副作用;(2)后效应的存在。通过双极同心电极进行中枢刺激(50Hz正弦波),并通过电刺激尾巴引起的发声阈值变化来量化镇痛效果。在腹侧PAG内,发声阈值随着中枢刺激强度的增加而逐渐升高,镇痛程度通常较强。该区域刺激所产生的镇痛作用强度与运动障碍之间没有关系。刺激停止后,抗伤害感受作用通常消失。只有当刺激强度足够强以诱导非常强的镇痛作用时,才会注意到刺激后的镇痛作用。在背侧和背外侧PAG以及围绕导水管的腹侧区域内,镇痛作用突然出现,通常不太明显,并且总是伴随着强烈的厌恶反应。与腹侧PAG的镇痛作用相反,观察到明显的后效应。尽管对这些区域没有进行广泛研究,但从PAG外部的区域(上丘、上丘间连合以及与背外侧PAG相邻的顶盖)刺激也获得了这些特征。通过考虑文献中的各种数据,本研究明确区分了腹侧PAG与背侧PAG产生的刺激镇痛(SPA),得出从中脑区域诱导的镇痛作用至少涉及两种不同神经元底物的结论。虽然腹侧PAG似乎更优先参与疼痛调节,但对厌恶区域(广泛分布在PAG上)刺激引发的“镇痛”的真实性提出了质疑,并考虑了解释镇痛作用和厌恶同时出现的提议。