Studebaker G A, Cox R M, Wark D J
Audiology. 1978 Mar-Apr;17(2):173-86. doi: 10.3109/00206097809080044.
The validity of probe tube microphone measurements in providing data indicative of the magnitude of the change in subjects' threshold resulting from changes in earmold configuration was investigated. The relationship between these measures in the real ear canal and the changes observed in 2-cm3 and Zwislocki couplers under similar circumstances or earmold modification was also measured. Standard, vented and 'open' earmold conditions were utilized. Threshold and probe-tube measurements were made. Statistical evaluation revealed that these two techniques did not produce significantly different results except at 125--165 Hz, where noise masking may have been a factor influencing the threshold data. Neither coupler as used gave an accurate quantitative estimate of the in-use effects of vented earmolds or the open earmold configuration, but the Zwislocki coupler gave a better approximation than the 2-cm3 coupler.
研究了探管传声器测量在提供数据以表明耳模配置变化导致受试者阈值变化幅度方面的有效性。还测量了在真实耳道中这些测量值与在类似情况下或耳模修改时在2立方厘米和兹维兹洛斯基耦合器中观察到的变化之间的关系。采用了标准、带通气孔和“开放式”耳模条件。进行了阈值和探管测量。统计评估表明,除了在125 - 165赫兹处,这两种技术产生的结果没有显著差异,在该频率处噪声掩蔽可能是影响阈值数据的一个因素。所使用的两种耦合器都没有对带通气孔耳模或开放式耳模配置的实际使用效果给出准确的定量估计,但兹维兹洛斯基耦合器比2立方厘米耦合器给出了更好的近似值。