Vaislic C D, Tasrini J, Bouayed N, Puel P, Cerene A
J Chir (Paris). 1984 Apr;121(4):269-71.
Autogenous saphenous vein (ASV) (50 patients-group I) was compared to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (50 patients group II), in 100 below-knee femoropopliteal bypass (FPB) procedures performed for limb salvage during à 5 year-period. PTFE was used as an alternative procedure in the absence of a suitable ASV. Each group made of 50 patients was not significantly different from the other. The mean follow up period for patent graft is now 35 months (12-60 months) and the overall life table cumulative patency at 5 years, is 65% in group I and 18% in group II (P less than 0.05) whereas the limb salvage rate (LSR) is 81% with ASV and 26% PTFE (P less than 0.05). No correlation was demonstrated between patency and run-off. The graft described was used in elderly patients most of whom would have had amputation before the introduction of PTFE. Theses results advocate the use of PTFE only in secondary intention and never to shorter operation time.
在5年期间为挽救肢体而进行的100例膝下股腘动脉搭桥术(FPB)中,将自体隐静脉(ASV)(50例患者,I组)与聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)(50例患者,II组)进行了比较。在没有合适的ASV时,PTFE用作替代手术。每组50例患者之间无显著差异。目前,通畅移植物的平均随访期为35个月(12 - 60个月),5年时I组的总体生命表累积通畅率为65%,II组为18%(P < 0.05),而使用ASV时肢体挽救率(LSR)为81%,PTFE为26%(P < 0.05)。通畅率与流出道之间未显示相关性。所描述的移植物用于老年患者,在PTFE引入之前,他们中的大多数人会接受截肢手术。这些结果表明,PTFE仅应在次要意图中使用,绝不能为了缩短手术时间而使用。