Watson A
Am J Surg. 1984 Sep;148(3):346-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90468-9.
A clinical study of a personal series of 120 patients with peptic esophageal stricture has been conducted. All of the patients were managed by intermittent fiberoptic dilatation performed with diazepam sedation and antireflux measures. Reflux control was attempted pharmacologically early in the study in all patients and subsequently by antireflux surgery in younger patients. Dilatation was performed in all patients as frequently as necessary to maintain satisfactory swallowing. In the 42 surgically treated patients, an effective antireflux operation was achieved, principally by an abdominal approach, without mortality. A single dilatation was sufficient in 71 percent of these patients, the mean number of dilatations required to maintain adequate swallowing being 1.6 during a mean follow-up period of 3.3 years. In the medically treated group, a single dilatation sufficed in 41 percent of the patients, the mean number of dilatations required being 3.1 in a similar follow-up period. In three patients in the latter group esophageal carcinoma superimposed on their peptic stricture while they were under surveillance. Although not randomized, this study suggests that antireflux surgery is beneficial in younger patients for reducing the need for subsequent dilatations and prolonged medication, which may be relevant in the context of the incidence of carcinoma in preexisting peptic strictures in this series and in series reported by others. The conclusions that thought to justify the controlled clinical trial currently in progress to further elevate this impression.
对个人收集的120例食管消化性狭窄患者进行了一项临床研究。所有患者均采用在地西泮镇静下进行的间歇性纤维光学扩张术及抗反流措施进行治疗。在研究早期,所有患者均尝试通过药物控制反流,随后对年轻患者采用抗反流手术。根据需要对所有患者进行扩张,以维持满意的吞咽功能。在42例接受手术治疗的患者中,主要通过腹部手术成功实施了有效的抗反流手术,无死亡病例。在这些患者中,71%的患者单次扩张就足够了,在平均3.3年的随访期内,维持足够吞咽功能所需的平均扩张次数为1.6次。在药物治疗组中,41%的患者单次扩张就足够了,在相似的随访期内所需的平均扩张次数为3.1次。在该组的3例患者中,在监测期间其消化性狭窄并发了食管癌。尽管该研究未进行随机分组,但提示抗反流手术对年轻患者有益,可减少后续扩张及长期用药的需求,这在本系列及其他报道系列中,对于既往存在消化性狭窄患者的癌症发生率可能具有重要意义。目前正在进行对照临床试验以进一步证实这一观点,这些结论被认为可为该试验提供依据。