Suppr超能文献

布比卡因用于蛛网膜下腔阻滞的高比重和等比重溶液比较。

A comparison of hyper- and isobaric solutions of bupivacaine for subarachnoid block.

作者信息

Phelan D M, MacEvilly M

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1984 May;12(2):101-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8401200202.

Abstract

The comparative efficacy of two solutions of bupivacaine, 0.5% plain (isobaric-specific gravity 1.010), and 0.4% bupivacaine (hyperbaric-specific gravity 1.027) in 4% dextrose, for spinal anaesthesia was studied in 67 patients. Both solutions were clinically satisfactory (94% completely successful neural blockade). Hyperbaric bupivacaine blocks a greater number of spinal segments (p less than 0.01), causes a more rapid fall in blood pressure (p less than 0.05), and is more predictable in effect with regard to the number of segments blocked and to the lateralisation of the block. The duration of perioperative analgesia with the hyperbaric preparation is, however, shorter-3.8 hours as opposed to 5.8 hours (p less than 0.01)--but this was likely to be due to the smaller total dosage of bupivacaine used in the hyperbaric group. It is concluded that either solution may be used satisfactorily in clinical practice. The isobaric solution, however, despite its ready availability, is less satisfactory than the hyperbaric because its effect with regard to the extent of blockade is less predictable.

摘要

在67例患者中研究了0.5%布比卡因普通溶液(等比重,比重1.010)和0.4%布比卡因(重比重,比重1.027)加4%葡萄糖溶液用于脊髓麻醉的相对疗效。两种溶液在临床上均令人满意(94%神经阻滞完全成功)。重比重布比卡因阻滞的脊髓节段更多(p<0.01),导致血压下降更快(p<0.05),并且在阻滞节段数量和阻滞侧别方面效果更可预测。然而,重比重制剂的围手术期镇痛持续时间较短——3.8小时,而等比重制剂为5.8小时(p<0.01)——但这可能是由于重比重组使用的布比卡因总剂量较小。结论是两种溶液在临床实践中均可令人满意地使用。然而,等比重溶液尽管容易获得,但不如重比重溶液令人满意,因为其阻滞范围的效果较难预测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验