Hine K R, Hawkey C J, Atkinson M, Holmes G K
Gut. 1984 Oct;25(10):1100-2. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.10.1100.
The Celestin and Eder-Puestow methods of dilating benign oesophageal strictures have been compared prospectively in a randomised trial. One hundred and thirty three dilatations were performed on 72 patients. There was no significant difference between the two techniques with regard to the long term relief of symptoms. Celestin dilatation was quicker, less likely to cause pharyngeal trauma, and less damaging to guide wires. It could not be used, however, in those patients in whom only a short length of guide wire could be passed through the stricture.
在一项随机试验中，对塞莱斯廷（Celestin）和埃德尔-普斯托（Eder-Puestow）扩张良性食管狭窄的方法进行了前瞻性比较。对72例患者进行了133次扩张。两种技术在症状的长期缓解方面没有显著差异。塞莱斯廷扩张更快，引起咽部创伤的可能性更小，对导丝的损伤也更小。然而，对于那些只能通过较短长度导丝穿过狭窄部位的患者，该方法无法使用。
