Suppr超能文献

用于扩张良性食管狭窄的埃德尔-普斯托法与塞莱斯廷法的比较。

Comparison of the Eder-Puestow and Celestin techniques for dilating benign oesophageal strictures.

作者信息

Hine K R, Hawkey C J, Atkinson M, Holmes G K

出版信息

Gut. 1984 Oct;25(10):1100-2. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.10.1100.

Abstract

The Celestin and Eder-Puestow methods of dilating benign oesophageal strictures have been compared prospectively in a randomised trial. One hundred and thirty three dilatations were performed on 72 patients. There was no significant difference between the two techniques with regard to the long term relief of symptoms. Celestin dilatation was quicker, less likely to cause pharyngeal trauma, and less damaging to guide wires. It could not be used, however, in those patients in whom only a short length of guide wire could be passed through the stricture.

摘要

在一项随机试验中,对塞莱斯廷(Celestin)和埃德尔-普斯托(Eder-Puestow)扩张良性食管狭窄的方法进行了前瞻性比较。对72例患者进行了133次扩张。两种技术在症状的长期缓解方面没有显著差异。塞莱斯廷扩张更快,引起咽部创伤的可能性更小,对导丝的损伤也更小。然而,对于那些只能通过较短长度导丝穿过狭窄部位的患者,该方法无法使用。

相似文献

5
Conservative management of benign oesophageal strictures.良性食管狭窄的保守治疗
Endoscopy. 1981 Mar;13(2):55-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021646.
8
[Dilatation of esophageal stenoses].[食管狭窄的扩张术]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 May 20;110(13):1711-3.
10
Modern treatment of oesophageal strictures.食管狭窄的现代治疗方法。
Med J Aust. 1980 Feb 9;1(3):129-30. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1980.tb134690.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验