Suppr超能文献

用于良性食管狭窄扩张的球囊或探条?一项随机对照试验的中期报告。

Balloon or bougie for dilatation of benign oesophageal stricture? An interim report of a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Cox J G, Winter R K, Maslin S C, Jones R, Buckton G K, Hoare R C, Sutton D R, Bennett J R

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hull Royal Infirmary.

出版信息

Gut. 1988 Dec;29(12):1741-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.12.1741.

Abstract

Seventy one patients with benign oesophageal strictures were randomised to receive balloon or bougie dilatation. Sixty five patients were eligible for analysis. At the end of five months the balloon group had significantly more dysphagia and the calibre of the strictures in the balloon group had narrowed by a greater degree. The methods were equally safe and acceptable to patients. While the choice of the method of dilatation depends on the individual patient's needs and operator experience, bougie dilatation is more effective in reducing dysphagia and maintaining stricture patency.

摘要

71例良性食管狭窄患者被随机分为接受球囊扩张或探条扩张两组。65例患者符合分析条件。五个月结束时,球囊扩张组吞咽困难明显更多,且该组狭窄口径缩小程度更大。两种方法对患者而言安全性相当且均可接受。虽然扩张方法的选择取决于个体患者的需求和术者经验,但探条扩张在减轻吞咽困难和维持狭窄通畅方面更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/463e/1434110/d95fc31bf60f/gut00238-0139-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验