Cox J G, Winter R K, Maslin S C, Jones R, Buckton G K, Hoare R C, Sutton D R, Bennett J R
Department of Gastroenterology, Hull Royal Infirmary.
Gut. 1988 Dec;29(12):1741-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.12.1741.
Seventy one patients with benign oesophageal strictures were randomised to receive balloon or bougie dilatation. Sixty five patients were eligible for analysis. At the end of five months the balloon group had significantly more dysphagia and the calibre of the strictures in the balloon group had narrowed by a greater degree. The methods were equally safe and acceptable to patients. While the choice of the method of dilatation depends on the individual patient's needs and operator experience, bougie dilatation is more effective in reducing dysphagia and maintaining stricture patency.
71例良性食管狭窄患者被随机分为接受球囊扩张或探条扩张两组。65例患者符合分析条件。五个月结束时,球囊扩张组吞咽困难明显更多,且该组狭窄口径缩小程度更大。两种方法对患者而言安全性相当且均可接受。虽然扩张方法的选择取决于个体患者的需求和术者经验,但探条扩张在减轻吞咽困难和维持狭窄通畅方面更有效。