Suppr超能文献

父权指数与父权归属

Paternity index and attribution of paternity.

作者信息

Valentin J

出版信息

Hum Hered. 1984;34(4):255-7. doi: 10.1159/000153473.

Abstract

If blood typing and similar tests do not exclude a putative father in a paternity case, his probability of paternity can be assessed with the formulae of Essen-Möller[1938]. Gürtler[1956] uses an alternative route, viz. the paternity index, to reach identical end results. Majumder and Nei [1983] claim that the methods are not powerful enough. This opinion can always be defended, but may have been enhanced by their inadequate computer model. They also contend that current methods may more often than not lead to false attributions of paternity. This is outright erroneous.

摘要

在亲子鉴定案件中,如果血型鉴定及类似检测不能排除推定父亲,其亲权概率可用埃森 - 默勒(Essen - Möller)[1938年]的公式进行评估。居尔特勒(Gürtler)[1956年]采用了另一种方法,即亲权指数,以得出相同的最终结果。马宗德(Majumder)和内(Nei)[1983年]声称这些方法的效力不够强大。这种观点总能找到依据,但可能因他们不充分的计算机模型而被强化。他们还争辩说,当前方法往往会导致错误的亲权认定。这是完全错误的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验