Valentin J
Hum Hered. 1984;34(4):255-7. doi: 10.1159/000153473.
If blood typing and similar tests do not exclude a putative father in a paternity case, his probability of paternity can be assessed with the formulae of Essen-Möller[1938]. Gürtler[1956] uses an alternative route, viz. the paternity index, to reach identical end results. Majumder and Nei [1983] claim that the methods are not powerful enough. This opinion can always be defended, but may have been enhanced by their inadequate computer model. They also contend that current methods may more often than not lead to false attributions of paternity. This is outright erroneous.
在亲子鉴定案件中,如果血型鉴定及类似检测不能排除推定父亲,其亲权概率可用埃森 - 默勒(Essen - Möller)[1938年]的公式进行评估。居尔特勒(Gürtler)[1956年]采用了另一种方法,即亲权指数,以得出相同的最终结果。马宗德(Majumder)和内(Nei)[1983年]声称这些方法的效力不够强大。这种观点总能找到依据,但可能因他们不充分的计算机模型而被强化。他们还争辩说,当前方法往往会导致错误的亲权认定。这是完全错误的。