Rosenbaum D N
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Jul;40(4):1106-11. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198407)40:4<1106::aid-jclp2270400443>3.0.co;2-g.
In 1970, the APA's Psychotherapy Curriculum and Consultation Committee on Psychotherapy Training recommended that the faculty of training programs should formulate and publish explicit criteria by which the student's practice of psychotherapy can be evaluated. An informal survey of advanced clinical psychology graduate students (N = 17) of an APA-approved program indicated that during their first year of psychotherapy training, 77% of the students either did not know the criteria used to evaluate their performance as psychotherapists or thought that the evaluation was based on the professor's personal biases. The issue of using client outcome vs. competence in explicitly specified therapeutic skills as evaluative criteria was discussed. A combination of both criteria was recommended for implementation in training programs.
1970年，美国心理学会（APA）的心理治疗课程与心理治疗培训咨询委员会建议，培训项目的教员应制定并公布明确的标准，据此对学生的心理治疗实践进行评估。对一个经美国心理学会认可的项目中的17名临床心理学专业高年级研究生进行的一项非正式调查表明，在心理治疗培训的第一年，77%的学生要么不知道用于评估其作为心理治疗师表现的标准，要么认为评估是基于教授的个人偏见。讨论了将来访者的治疗结果与明确规定的治疗技能方面的能力作为评估标准的问题。建议在培训项目中同时采用这两种标准。
