Suppr超能文献

方法比较研究中几种回归程序的比较及样本量的确定。临床化学中方法比较研究的线性回归程序应用,第二部分。

Comparison of several regression procedures for method comparison studies and determination of sample sizes. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part II.

作者信息

Passing H, Bablok W

出版信息

J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1984 Jun;22(6):431-45. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1984.22.6.431.

Abstract

In part I of this series (H. Passing & W. Bablok (1983), J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 21, 709-720) we described a new biometrical procedure for the evaluation of method comparison studies. In part II we now discuss its properties and compare them with those of other established procedures by means of a simulation study. We demonstrate that the reliability of the results not only depends on the sample size but also on the sampling distribution, the precision of the methods, and the concentration range covered by the samples. Linear regression and principal component procedures are either inadequate or not as reliable as our new procedure. The appropriate sample size is discussed and recommendations are given.

摘要

在本系列的第一部分(H. Passing和W. Bablok(1983年),《临床化学与临床生物化学杂志》21卷,709 - 720页)中,我们描述了一种用于评估方法比较研究的新生物统计学方法。在第二部分中,我们现在讨论其特性,并通过模拟研究将其与其他既定方法的特性进行比较。我们证明,结果的可靠性不仅取决于样本量,还取决于抽样分布、方法的精密度以及样本所涵盖的浓度范围。线性回归和主成分方法要么不适用,要么不如我们的新方法可靠。文中讨论了合适的样本量并给出了建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验