Passing H, Bablok W
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1984 Jun;22(6):431-45. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1984.22.6.431.
In part I of this series (H. Passing & W. Bablok (1983), J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 21, 709-720) we described a new biometrical procedure for the evaluation of method comparison studies. In part II we now discuss its properties and compare them with those of other established procedures by means of a simulation study. We demonstrate that the reliability of the results not only depends on the sample size but also on the sampling distribution, the precision of the methods, and the concentration range covered by the samples. Linear regression and principal component procedures are either inadequate or not as reliable as our new procedure. The appropriate sample size is discussed and recommendations are given.
在本系列的第一部分(H. Passing和W. Bablok(1983年),《临床化学与临床生物化学杂志》21卷,709 - 720页)中,我们描述了一种用于评估方法比较研究的新生物统计学方法。在第二部分中,我们现在讨论其特性,并通过模拟研究将其与其他既定方法的特性进行比较。我们证明,结果的可靠性不仅取决于样本量,还取决于抽样分布、方法的精密度以及样本所涵盖的浓度范围。线性回归和主成分方法要么不适用,要么不如我们的新方法可靠。文中讨论了合适的样本量并给出了建议。