Tomecki K J, Tomecki E C
South Med J. 1984 Sep;77(9):1118-20. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198409000-00015.
Of 9,375 inpatients consecutively discharged from a major university hospital during a six-month period, 2,912 (31%) had a serologic test for syphilis (STS) before or during hospitalization. Seventy-five patients (2.6%) had reactive serology, and further testing confirmed the diagnosis of syphilis in at least 56 patients (75%). Forty-seven (84%) of the 56 patients were aged 40 or more, and 32 (57%) were women; seven (12.5%) had a spinal tap. A history of venereal disease was recorded for only 20 patients (36%), and 16 had a positive history of venereal disease or exposure. Forty-three percent of patients with reactive serology, including those with a biologic false-positive reaction, had proper management, including treatment when indicated. Only 16 (28%) of the 56 patients with syphilis had evidence of adequate therapy either before, during, or after hospitalization. We conclude that STS is frequently omitted in the evaluation of hospitalized persons, and that even with evidence of positive serology, the diagnosis, proper interpretation, and therapy are often ignored.
在一所大型大学医院六个月期间连续出院的9375名住院患者中,2912名(31%)在住院前或住院期间进行了梅毒血清学检测(STS)。75名患者(2.6%)血清学反应呈阳性,进一步检测确诊至少56名患者(75%)患有梅毒。56名患者中有47名(84%)年龄在40岁及以上,32名(57%)为女性;7名(12.5%)进行了腰椎穿刺。仅20名患者(36%)记录有性病病史,其中16名有性病或接触史阳性。血清学反应呈阳性的患者中,包括那些有生物学假阳性反应的患者,43%得到了妥善处理,包括在有指征时进行治疗。56名梅毒患者中只有16名(28%)在住院前、住院期间或住院后有充分治疗的证据。我们得出结论,在对住院患者的评估中经常遗漏STS检测,而且即使有血清学阳性的证据,诊断、正确解读和治疗也常常被忽视。