• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1982年美国外科医师学会开展的美国全国乳腺癌调查。

The 1982 national survey of carcinoma of the breast in the United States by the American College of Surgeons.

作者信息

Wilson R E, Donegan W L, Mettlin C, Natarajan N, Smart C R, Murphy G P

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984 Oct;159(4):309-18.

PMID:6484787
Abstract

The 1982 survey documented changes in the management of carcinoma of the breast in this country. If one compares the current survey results with the results of the 1978 survey, an inescapable conclusion is that there is a changing understanding of carcinoma of the breast and a willingness to apply new knowledge to clinical practice. These results also show the potential of the hospital Tumor Registry when records are systematically aggregated and data from different points compared. Future applications of this survey procedure and further analyses of these data may be used to document progress in the control of cancer. While useful for these purposes, it should be noted that these data are not intended, nor suited, for assessing the superiority of given treatments. They may not reflect the outcome that would result from a clinical trial. Comparisons made herein often involve patients who differed in many respects other than that on which the comparison was focused. However, within these constraints, the data may be useful for clinicians and scientists interested in the dynamic state of the treatment of carcinoma of the breast in large numbers of hospitals in the United States.

摘要

1982年的调查记录了该国乳腺癌治疗方法的变化。如果将当前的调查结果与1978年的调查结果进行比较,就会得出一个不可避免的结论:人们对乳腺癌的认识在不断变化,并且愿意将新知识应用于临床实践。这些结果还表明,当医院肿瘤登记处的记录被系统汇总并比较不同时间点的数据时,其具有的潜力。该调查程序的未来应用以及对这些数据的进一步分析,可用于记录癌症控制方面的进展。虽然这些数据对于这些目的很有用,但应该注意的是,这些数据并非旨在评估特定治疗方法的优越性,也不适合用于此。它们可能无法反映临床试验的结果。本文所做的比较往往涉及除了比较所关注的方面之外在许多方面都存在差异的患者。然而,在这些限制范围内,这些数据对于关注美国大量医院中乳腺癌治疗动态情况的临床医生和科学家可能是有用的。

相似文献

1
The 1982 national survey of carcinoma of the breast in the United States by the American College of Surgeons.1982年美国外科医师学会开展的美国全国乳腺癌调查。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984 Oct;159(4):309-18.
2
1998-1999 patterns of care study process survey of national practice patterns using breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy in the management of stage I-II breast cancer.1998 - 1999年护理模式研究:关于在I - II期乳腺癌治疗中采用保乳手术和放疗的全国实践模式的过程调查
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 May 1;62(1):183-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.019.
3
The National Cancer Data Base report on the results of a large nonrandomized comparison of breast preservation and modified radical mastectomy.国家癌症数据库关于保乳术与改良根治性乳房切除术大型非随机比较结果的报告。
Cancer. 1997 Jul 1;80(1):162-7.
4
The management of early breast carcinoma before and after the introduction of clinical practice guidelines.临床实践指南引入前后早期乳腺癌的管理
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):476-85. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20401.
5
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
6
A French national survey on infiltrating breast cancer: analysis of clinico-pathological features and treatment modalities in 1159 patients.一项关于浸润性乳腺癌的法国全国性调查:1159例患者的临床病理特征及治疗方式分析
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Jan;95(1):55-64. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9034-6. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
7
Surgeons: A Future Role in Clinical Trials?外科医生:在临床试验中未来会扮演何种角色?
Oncologist. 1997;2(3):V-VI.
8
The nature of tamoxifen action in the control of female breast cancer.他莫昔芬在女性乳腺癌控制中的作用本质。
In Vivo. 2001 Jul-Aug;15(4):319-25.
9
Potential applicability of balloon catheter-based accelerated partial breast irradiation after conservative surgery for breast carcinoma.球囊导管辅助的加速部分乳腺照射在乳腺癌保乳手术后的潜在适用性。
Cancer. 2004 Feb 1;100(3):490-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11939.
10
Blood hemoglobin level and treatment outcome of early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌的血血红蛋白水平与治疗结果
Strahlenther Onkol. 2004 Jan;180(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00066-004-1123-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A century of breast surgery: from radical to minimal.百年乳腺外科:从根治术到微创手术
Can J Surg. 2014 Aug;57(4):E147-8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.005814.
2
Clinical comparison of four types of skin incisions for skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.保留皮肤乳腺切除术及即刻乳房重建四种皮肤切口的临床比较
Surg Today. 2014 Aug;44(8):1470-5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0722-2. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
3
Retrospective comparison of non-skin-sparing mastectomy and skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction.
非保乳全乳切除术与保乳全乳切除术同期即刻乳房重建的回顾性比较
Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:876520. doi: 10.1155/2011/876520. Epub 2011 Aug 14.
4
Factors influencing the outcome of breast cancer patients with 10 or more metastasized axillary lymph nodes.影响 10 个或更多腋窝转移淋巴结的乳腺癌患者结局的因素。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct;16(5):473-81. doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0207-5. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
5
General surgery: conservative surgical treatment of carcinoma of the breast.普通外科:乳腺癌的保守手术治疗
West J Med. 1985 Apr;142(4):543-4.
6
Epidemiology and patterns of care for invasive breast carcinoma at a community hospital in Southern India.印度南部一家社区医院浸润性乳腺癌的流行病学及治疗模式
World J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 23;5:56. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-56.
7
[Axillar lymphadenectomy].腋窝淋巴结清扫术
Chirurg. 2007 Mar;78(3):194, 196-202. doi: 10.1007/s00104-006-1297-x.
8
Community-based assessment of adjuvant hormone therapy in women with breast cancer, 1991-1997.1991 - 1997年乳腺癌女性辅助激素治疗的社区评估
Breast J. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):433-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21357.x.
9
Discrepancy between consensus recommendations and actual community use of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性辅助化疗的共识性建议与实际社区应用之间的差异。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jan 21;138(2):90-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-2-200301210-00009.
10
Increase of chemotherapy use in older women with breast carcinoma from 1991 to 1996.1991年至1996年老年乳腺癌女性化疗使用率的增长。
Cancer. 2001 Aug 15;92(4):730-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4<730::aid-cncr1376>3.0.co;2-p.