Buckley R A, Dreosti I E
Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 Oct;40(4):840-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/40.4.840.
Various standard procedures were investigated in relation to the removal of exogenously applied 65Zn from human hair and endogenously incorporated 65Zn from rat hair. Human hair was found to adsorb zinc and a variety of other metal ions from aqueous solutions in a manner which suggested some ion-exchange capacity. Uptake of zinc varied considerably between human hair samples, but in most cases accumulation of zinc occurred rapidly and often resulted in hair zinc levels several-fold higher than found in control samples. Extraction of zinc and other metal ions was greatest after treatment with disodium EDTA and sodium lauryl sulfate than after washing with water or aqueous Triton X-100. However, no procedure effectively removed all exogenous zinc, while all treatments extracted varying proportions of the endogenous zinc component. Because of the inability of standard washing procedures to remove exogenous zinc without reducing endogenous or indicator zinc levels, use of hair zinc analyses to indicate nutritional zinc status are inadvisable if hair zinc contamination is likely to have occurred.
研究了多种标准程序,用于去除人发中外源施加的65Zn以及大鼠毛发中内源性掺入的65Zn。发现人发能从水溶液中吸附锌和多种其他金属离子,其方式表明具有一定的离子交换能力。不同人发样本对锌的摄取差异很大,但在大多数情况下,锌的积累迅速发生,且常常导致毛发锌水平比对照样本高出几倍。用乙二胺四乙酸二钠和十二烷基硫酸钠处理后,锌和其他金属离子的提取量比用水或 Triton X - 100水溶液洗涤后要大。然而,没有一种程序能有效去除所有外源锌,而所有处理都会提取出不同比例的内源性锌成分。由于标准洗涤程序无法在不降低内源性或指示性锌水平的情况下去除外源锌,如果可能发生了毛发锌污染,那么使用毛发锌分析来指示营养锌状态是不可取的。