Suppr超能文献

有色豚鼠和白化豚鼠之间的一些耳科学差异。

Some otological differences between pigmented and albino-type guinea pigs.

作者信息

Harrison R V, Palmer A, Aran J M

出版信息

Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;240(3):271-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00453382.

Abstract

Cochlear action potential thresholds across frequency (AP audiograms) and AP tuning curves were compared in albino (Dunkin-Hartley) guinea pigs and normal pigmented animals. AP audiograms were very similar; on average the albinos had AP thresholds 2-3 dB lower at 2 kHz and below compared with the pigmented guinea pig. AP tuning curves at 16 kHz were, on average, significantly less sharply tuned in the albino, but similar at 8, 4, and 2 kHz. Although we find only small differences in these measures of normal cochlear function, other evidence in the literature suggests that in auditory research the use of "albino" guinea pigs is best avoided.

摘要

对白化(邓金-哈特利)豚鼠和正常毛色豚鼠的频率耳蜗动作电位阈值(AP听力图)及AP调谐曲线进行了比较。AP听力图非常相似;平均而言,与毛色正常的豚鼠相比,白化豚鼠在2千赫及以下频率的AP阈值低2-3分贝。白化豚鼠16千赫处的AP调谐曲线平均调谐明显不如正常毛色豚鼠尖锐,但在8千赫、4千赫和2千赫处相似。尽管我们发现这些正常耳蜗功能指标仅有细微差异,但文献中的其他证据表明,在听觉研究中最好避免使用“白化”豚鼠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验