Maranhão T
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1984 Sep;8(3):255-79, 281. doi: 10.1007/BF00055170.
There has been among family therapists a widespread belief that anthropology is at least useful if not kindred to their field. The belief springs from the assumption that families in different cultural milieus have different ways of expressing their experience of intimacy in everyday life. If this is true, family organization transcends culture, and the latter is a mere language or mode of expression of the more basic pillar of family organization. However, the assumption is also strong that different cultural contexts produce different types of families, and the natural consequence of this hypothesis is that family therapy as developed in the United States would be restricted to dealing with American families, while the problems of family life elsewhere should be meted by the local cultural ways. These two hypotheses, namely that of family universality and that of cultural relativism, are far ends of a continuum. The more interesting and real cases lie somewhere in the middle. In the following argument I will discuss this subject by presenting a brief overview of family therapy's theories and practices for those readers who know nothing about it, by reviewing a recent book that makes the claim that therapists will benefit from some kind of anthropological knowledge, and finally by turning the question on its head and addressing the interest family therapy may have for anthropologists.
在家庭治疗师中,一直存在一种普遍的观点,即人类学即便与他们的领域没有亲缘关系,至少也是有用的。这种观点源于这样一种假设,即处于不同文化环境中的家庭在日常生活中表达亲密体验的方式各不相同。如果这是真的,那么家庭组织超越了文化,而文化仅仅是家庭组织这一更基本支柱的一种语言或表达方式。然而,另一种观点也很强烈,即不同的文化背景会产生不同类型的家庭,这一假设的自然结果是,在美国发展起来的家庭治疗将仅限于处理美国家庭,而其他地方的家庭生活问题则应由当地的文化方式来解决。这两种假设,即家庭普遍性假设和文化相对主义假设,处于一个连续体的两端。更有趣和现实的情况则介于两者之间。在下面的论证中,我将通过为那些对家庭治疗一无所知的读者简要概述家庭治疗的理论和实践,回顾一本最近声称治疗师将从某种人类学知识中受益的书,最后将问题倒过来,探讨家庭治疗可能引起人类学家兴趣的方面,来讨论这个主题。