Spincemaille J, Delanghe J, De Buyzere M, Breemeersch M, Blaton V
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1984 Sep;22(9):603-7. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1984.22.9.603.
Three current methods for the determination of the creatine kinase-MB activity were evaluated: electrophoresis (Beckman Inst.), ion-exchange MB-Zyme (J.T. Baker) and ion-exchange on aca (Du Pont). Eighty patients were selected out of three groups: acute myocardial infarction, heart and vascular surgery patients and a number of noncardiac cases. The precision of the ion-exchange methods was comparable; CV 5.7% (aca) and CV 5.2% (MB-Zyme) for a high creatine kinase-MB pool. Electrophoresis overestimated the creatine/kinase-MB/activity and was less precise (CV 9.6%) and less sensitive than the ion-exchange methods. The aca (Du Pont) method was less specific than the MB-Zyme. The main source of discrepancy was samples from certain patients in the surgery unit, which gave falsely high value by the aca method, and showed altered mobility in electrophoresis, suggesting an atypical creatine kinase. Three macro creatine kinase type I included in this study were erroneously determined as creatine kinase-MB by both the ion-exchange methods.
对目前三种测定肌酸激酶MB活性的方法进行了评估:电泳法(贝克曼仪器公司)、离子交换MB-Zyme法(J.T.贝克公司)和aca离子交换法(杜邦公司)。从三组患者中选取了80例:急性心肌梗死患者、心脏和血管手术患者以及一些非心脏疾病患者。离子交换法的精密度相当;对于高肌酸激酶MB样本,aca法的变异系数(CV)为5.7%,MB-Zyme法的CV为5.2%。电泳法高估了肌酸/激酶-MB活性,精密度较低(CV为9.6%),且不如离子交换法灵敏。aca(杜邦)法的特异性低于MB-Zyme法。差异的主要来源是手术科室某些患者的样本,这些样本用aca法测定时结果假高,且在电泳中显示迁移率改变,提示存在非典型肌酸激酶。本研究中纳入的三个I型巨肌酸激酶被两种离子交换法错误地判定为肌酸激酶MB。