Adams K M
J Clin Neuropsychol. 1984 Nov;6(4):455-8. doi: 10.1080/01688638408401235.
The Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB) remains the subject of controversy among neuropsychologists. Substantial criticisms of a theoretical and applied nature have called into question its research basis as a clinical tool. In response to this, Stambrook (1983) has concluded that further research on the LNNB by neuropsychologists is required. The present commentary disputes this need, pointing to the test author's and publisher's primary responsibility for such research. Tests or batteries may be dropped from one's clinical practice without invoking an obligation on the part of neuropsychology.
鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验（LNNB）在神经心理学家中仍是一个有争议的话题。从理论和应用层面提出的大量批评对其作为临床工具的研究基础提出了质疑。对此，斯坦布鲁克（1983年）得出结论，神经心理学家需要对LNNB进行进一步研究。本评论对这种必要性提出质疑，指出测验作者和出版商对此类研究负有主要责任。测验或成套测验可能会从某人的临床实践中被摒弃，而无需神经心理学承担相应义务。
