Bountress N G
J Commun Disord. 1984 Oct;17(5):349-59. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(84)90036-4.
This study is an extension of an earlier study conducted by Bountress and Laderberg (1981), which compared the performances of a group of children on two tests of speech-sound discrimination, the Wepman test and Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock test. The present study consisted of two treatments: The dual administration of the Boston University Speech Sound Discrimination Test and Wepman, and the Boston and Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock to two groups of 25 children. An analysis of the results of the two treatments indicated that, as was the case in Bountress and Laderberg's original research comparing the Wepman and Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock, neither the Boston or Wepman nor the Boston or Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock comparisons provided evidence that they are comparable measures of speech-sound discrimination. The results of both studies are analyzed, and implications are discussed.
本研究是Bountress和Laderberg（1981年）早期研究的扩展，该早期研究比较了一组儿童在两项语音辨别测试（韦普曼测试和戈德曼-弗里斯托-伍德科克测试）中的表现。本研究包括两种处理方式：对两组各25名儿童分别同时进行波士顿大学语音辨别测试和韦普曼测试，以及波士顿测试和戈德曼-弗里斯托-伍德科克测试。对这两种处理方式结果的分析表明，正如Bountress和Laderberg在比较韦普曼测试和戈德曼-弗里斯托-伍德科克测试的原始研究中那样，波士顿测试与韦普曼测试的比较，以及波士顿测试与戈德曼-弗里斯托-伍德科克测试的比较，均未提供证据表明它们是语音辨别方面的可比测量方法。对两项研究的结果进行了分析，并讨论了其意义。
