Suppr超能文献

高能量除颤与低能量除颤:梅奥诊所附属医院患者(不包括重症监护病房患者)的经验。

High-energy versus low-energy defibrillation: experience in patients (excluding those in the intensive care unit) at Mayo Clinic-affiliated hospitals.

作者信息

Morgan J P, Hearne S F, Raizes G S, White R D, Giuliani E R

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 1984 Dec;59(12):829-34. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65617-1.

Abstract

/he purpose of this study was to determine whether electric shocks of low (200 to 240 J), intermediate (300 to 320 J), or high (400 to 440 J) delivered energy were most successful in defibrillating hospitalized patients (excluding those in intensive care units) in whom resuscitation was attempted by a code emergency team. From January 1980 through December 1982, 101 cases of ventricular fibrillation in 100 patients were treated by Mayo Clinic code emergency teams. Many of the patients in this trial had secondary or agonal ventricular Defibrillation. Most patients (64%) were defibrillated by one to eight shocks. For the first shock, intermediate and high energy seemed to be more effective than low energy. Patient weight, time of delivery of shock 1 after onset of the code emergency, blood pH, acute and chronic medical diagnoses, and pharmacotherapy before the onset of ventricular fibrillation were not clearly related to the response to shock 1. Nine of 16 patients who did not initially respond to shocks of low or intermediate energy were defibrillated when higher energy was subsequently used. Only 14 patients ultimately survived and were dismissed from the hospital. These results suggest that in this patient population, high levels of delivered energy are preferable to low energy for the first shocks administered; we recommend that 400 J of delivered energy be used initially. The 360-J maximal energy dose available in most currently manufactured defibrillators should be sufficiently close to this recommendation to justify use of that dose with the initial shock.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究的目的是确定低能量(200至240焦耳)、中等能量(300至320焦耳)或高能量(400至440焦耳)电击在对由急救小组尝试进行复苏的住院患者(不包括重症监护病房患者)除颤时是否最为成功。从1980年1月至1982年12月,梅奥诊所急救小组对100名患者的101例心室颤动进行了治疗。该试验中的许多患者发生了继发性或濒死期心室颤动。大多数患者(64%)接受了一至八次电击除颤。对于首次电击,中等能量和高能量似乎比低能量更有效。患者体重、急救开始后首次电击的时间、血液pH值、急性和慢性医学诊断以及心室颤动发作前的药物治疗与首次电击的反应没有明显关联。16名最初对低能量或中等能量电击无反应的患者中,有9名在随后使用更高能量电击时成功除颤。最终只有14名患者存活并出院。这些结果表明,在该患者群体中,首次电击时高能量比低能量更可取;我们建议最初使用400焦耳的输送能量。目前大多数生产的除颤器可用的360焦耳最大能量剂量应足够接近此建议,从而证明在首次电击时使用该剂量是合理的。(摘要截短为250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验