• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学专家提供的初级保健的相对复杂性。

The relative complexity of primary care provided by medical specialists.

作者信息

Mendenhall R C, Moynihan C J, Radecki S E

出版信息

Med Care. 1984 Nov;22(11):987-1001. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198411000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198411000-00002
PMID:6503400
Abstract

Utilizing national data on patient care provided by family practitioners, general internists, and subspecialists in internal medicine, this study examines the complexity of care provided by generalist physicians versus subspecialty physicians on a disease-specific basis. Limiting the analysis to "principal care" provided by office-based physicians, the study finds the complexity of care provided by cardiologists for heart disease and by endocrinologists for diabetes mellitus to be somewhat greater than that provided by family practitioners and general internists, though the magnitude of the differences is not large. For chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, however, pulmonary disease specialists are shown to provide care that is substantially more complex than that provided by their generalist colleagues. For all disease and specialties, hospital care is substantially more complex than ambulatory care.

摘要

本研究利用家庭医生、普通内科医生和内科专科医生提供的全国患者护理数据,在特定疾病基础上考察了全科医生与专科医生所提供护理的复杂性。该研究将分析局限于门诊医生提供的“主要护理”,发现心脏病专家针对心脏病以及内分泌专家针对糖尿病所提供护理的复杂性,略高于家庭医生和普通内科医生所提供护理的复杂性,不过差异幅度不大。然而,对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病,肺病专科医生所提供的护理比其全科同行所提供的护理要复杂得多。对于所有疾病和专科来说,住院护理比门诊护理要复杂得多。

相似文献

1
The relative complexity of primary care provided by medical specialists.医学专家提供的初级保健的相对复杂性。
Med Care. 1984 Nov;22(11):987-1001. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198411000-00002.
2
Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties. Results from the medical outcomes study.不同系统和专科治疗的高血压及非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的治疗结果。医学结果研究的结果。
JAMA. 1995 Nov 8;274(18):1436-44.
3
The continuity of care provided to primary care patients. A comparison of family physicians, general internists, and medical subspecialists.为初级保健患者提供的连续性护理。家庭医生、普通内科医生和医学专科医生的比较。
Med Care. 1985 Jan;23(1):63-73. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198501000-00007.
4
The generalist role of specialty physicians: is there a hidden system of primary care?专科医生的通才角色:是否存在一个隐藏的初级保健体系?
JAMA. 1998 May 6;279(17):1364-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.17.1364.
5
Outcome following acute myocardial infarction: are differences among physician specialties the result of quality of care or case mix?急性心肌梗死后的结局:医师专业之间的差异是医疗质量还是病例组合的结果?
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Jul 12;159(13):1429-36. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.13.1429.
6
Identifying primary care disciplines by analyzing the diagnostic content of ambulatory care.通过分析门诊护理的诊断内容来确定初级护理学科。
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995 Jan-Feb;8(1):34-45.
7
Knowledge and practices of generalist and specialist physicians regarding drug therapy for acute myocardial infarction.全科医生和专科医生在急性心肌梗死药物治疗方面的知识与实践。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 27;331(17):1136-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410273311707.
8
Care and outcomes of patients newly hospitalized for heart failure in the community treated by cardiologists compared with other specialists.与其他专科医生相比,心脏病专家治疗的社区中新住院心力衰竭患者的护理及治疗结果。
Circulation. 2003 Jul 15;108(2):184-91. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080290.39027.48. Epub 2003 Jun 23.
9
Care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction by physician specialty: the effects of comorbidity and functional limitations.按医生专业划分的老年急性心肌梗死患者的护理与结局:合并症和功能受限的影响
Am J Med. 2000 Apr 15;108(6):460-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00331-4.
10
Patient preferences for care by general internists and specialists in the ambulatory setting.门诊环境下患者对普通内科医生和专科医生诊疗的偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Feb;15(2):75-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.05089.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of General Primary Care, Specialized Primary Care, and Other Veterans Affairs Services Among High-Risk Veterans.高危 Veterans 中普通初级保健、专科初级保健和其他 Veterans Affairs 服务的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208120. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8120.
2
Provision of primary care by specialist physicians: a systematic review.专科医生提供初级保健服务:一项系统综述。
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Feb 25;8(1):e000247. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2019-000247. eCollection 2020.
3
Systems and complexity thinking in the general practice literature: an integrative, historical narrative review.
系统与复杂性思维在全科医学文献中的应用:综合历史叙事性回顾。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;12(1):66-74. doi: 10.1370/afm.1593.
4
The role of insurance claims databases in drug therapy outcomes research.保险理赔数据库在药物治疗效果研究中的作用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):323-30. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00003.
5
Identification of psychosocial distress: a comparison of internal medicine and family medicine residents.心理社会困扰的识别:内科与家庭医学住院医师的比较
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;6(6):529-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02598222.