Suppr超能文献

连续动脉监测的替代部位。

Alternative sites for continuous arterial monitoring.

作者信息

Gordon L H, Brown M, Brown O W, Brown E M

出版信息

South Med J. 1984 Dec;77(12):1498-500. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198412000-00006.

Abstract

During a 13-month period, we studied 148 patients who had percutaneous arterial cannulation for continuous intraoperative, postoperative, and intensive care monitoring. In all patients, alternative arteries were cannulated, which included the brachial (43%), axillary (19%), femoral (28%), dorsalis pedis (8%), and superficial temporal artery (1%). No patient sustained any functionally significant or serious complication requiring surgical intervention. Eighteen patients (12%) had minor, clinically insignificant complications. We conclude that in the absence of an available radial artery, there are at least five other reliable arterial sites that may be cannulated and safely used when direct arterial monitoring is required.

摘要

在13个月的时间里,我们研究了148例接受经皮动脉插管以进行术中、术后及重症监护连续监测的患者。所有患者均选择了其他动脉进行插管,其中包括肱动脉(43%)、腋动脉(19%)、股动脉(28%)、足背动脉(8%)和颞浅动脉(1%)。没有患者出现任何需要手术干预的具有功能意义或严重的并发症。18例患者(12%)出现了轻微的、临床意义不大的并发症。我们得出结论,在没有可用桡动脉的情况下,当需要直接动脉监测时,至少还有其他五个可靠的动脉部位可进行插管并安全使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验