Friedman E A, Sachtleben-Murray M R, Dahrouge D, Neff R K
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec 15;150(8):941-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90386-7.
An investigation was undertaken in an effort to learn whether the type of delivery or the pattern of labor progression has any lasting effect on the infant. Paired-data design was chosen to ensure that the comparisons between homogeneous groups would be valid. Our objective was to reduce potential bias based on unequal distribution of patient characteristics that might be more or less commonly associated with abnormal labors or with difficult deliveries. Seven-year intelligence quotient data for matched pairs of cases showed significant long-range adverse impact from midforceps operations but not from low-forceps procedures. Comparable paired-data analysis for the effect of labor disorder on the infant verified a similar deleterious influence from both arrest and protraction patterns.
开展了一项调查,以了解分娩方式或产程进展模式是否对婴儿有任何长期影响。选择配对数据设计以确保同类组之间的比较有效。我们的目标是减少因患者特征分布不均可能导致的潜在偏差,这些特征可能或多或少与异常产程或难产相关。配对病例的七年智商数据显示,中位产钳术有显著的长期不良影响,而低位产钳术则没有。对产程紊乱对婴儿影响的类似配对数据分析证实,产程停滞和延长模式都有类似的有害影响。