Perry P J, Browne J L, Alexander B, Tsuang M T, Sherman A D, Dunner F J
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1984 Nov-Dec;9(6):555-63. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198409060-00005.
This study compared two prospective pharmacokinetic dosing methods to predict steady-state concentrations of nortriptyline. One method required multiple determinations of the nortriptyline plasma concentration to estimate the drug's steady-state concentration. The second method required a single nortriptyline concentration drawn at a fixed time, preferably 36 hours, following a nortriptyline test dose. The 36-hour nortriptyline plasma concentrations (NTP 36h) were substituted into the straight-line equation of Cssav = 17.2 + 3.74 (NTP 36h), where Cssav is the average steady-state concentration for a 100 mg/day dose of nortriptyline. No differences were noted between the observed steady-state nortriptyline concentration of 121 +/- 19 ng/ml, the 36-hour single-point prediction mean concentration of 121 +/- 21 ng/ml, or the multiple-point prediction mean concentration of 122 +/- 19 ng/ml. Because of the similar findings between the two methods, the clinical advantages and disadvantages of each kinetic approach are discussed to put these prospective dosing protocols into their proper perspective.
本研究比较了两种前瞻性药代动力学给药方法,以预测去甲替林的稳态浓度。一种方法需要多次测定去甲替林血浆浓度,以估计药物的稳态浓度。第二种方法需要在去甲替林试验剂量后,在固定时间(最好是36小时)采集单次去甲替林浓度。将36小时的去甲替林血浆浓度(NTP 36h)代入Cssav = 17.2 + 3.74(NTP 36h)的直线方程,其中Cssav是100毫克/天剂量去甲替林的平均稳态浓度。观察到的去甲替林稳态浓度为121±19纳克/毫升、36小时单点预测平均浓度为121±21纳克/毫升或多点预测平均浓度为122±19纳克/毫升之间未发现差异。由于两种方法的结果相似,因此讨论了每种动力学方法的临床优缺点,以便正确看待这些前瞻性给药方案。