Suppr超能文献

缓释吲哚美辛与双氟尼酸治疗骨关节炎患者的比较。

Comparison of slow-release indomethacin and diflunisal in patients with arthrosis.

作者信息

Gordin A, Karppinen I, Holttinen K

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1984;9(4):275-9. doi: 10.1185/03007998409109591.

Abstract

A double-blind, crossover study was carried out in 44 patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip or knee to compare the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with a new slow-release formulation of indomethacin (50 mg) with that of diflunisal (250 mg). After a 1-week wash-out period, patients were allocated at random to receive 2 tablets daily of one or other preparation for 6 weeks before being crossed over to the alternative drug for a further 6 weeks. Aspirin was allowed as a rescue analgesic throughout the study. Subjective assessments of pain and objective assessments of joint mobility were made before the start of treatment and at the end of each period, and details were recorded of rescue analgesic usage and any side-effects. Analysis of the results from 42 patients showed that whilst both treatments helped to alleviate pain, patients' overall evaluation of efficacy at the end of the study indicated that indomethacin was slightly more effective than diflunisal and there was a significant preference for indomethacin. Both drugs were well tolerated and none of the side-effects, reported in about 15% of patients on each drug, resulted in any withdrawals.

摘要

对44例髋或膝关节骨关节炎患者进行了一项双盲交叉研究,以比较新型缓释吲哚美辛制剂(50毫克)与双氟尼酸(250毫克)治疗的疗效和耐受性。在为期1周的洗脱期后,患者被随机分配,每天服用2片其中一种制剂,持续6周,然后换用另一种药物再治疗6周。在整个研究过程中允许使用阿司匹林作为急救镇痛药。在治疗开始前和每个阶段结束时进行疼痛的主观评估和关节活动度的客观评估,并记录急救镇痛药的使用情况和任何副作用的详细信息。对42例患者的结果分析表明,虽然两种治疗都有助于减轻疼痛,但患者在研究结束时对疗效的总体评价表明,吲哚美辛比双氟尼酸略有效,且患者对吲哚美辛有明显的偏好。两种药物耐受性良好,每种药物约15%的患者报告的副作用均未导致任何患者退出研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验