• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替诺昔康和吲哚美辛长效制剂治疗骨关节炎的多中心双盲比较

Multicentre double-blind comparison of sustained action formulations of tiaprofenic acid and indomethacin in osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Calin A, Cawley M I, Pal B, Rosenberg J N, Silas A M, Williams P I

机构信息

Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath.

出版信息

Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 1:57-63. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800351-00013.

DOI:10.2165/00003495-198800351-00013
PMID:3282867
Abstract

In a randomised double-blind, multicentre, crossover study, the short term efficacy and tolerance of a sustained action preparation of tiaprofenic acid 600 mg once daily was compared with sustained release indomethacin 75 mg once daily in 98 patients with osteoarthritis. After a minimum washout period of 3 days, patients were randomly allocated to receive each treatment in turn for a period of 4 weeks. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatments in the clinical assessments of pain level, duration of morning stiffness, articular index and functional impairment performed at the end of each treatment period. High pain levels on movement were reduced by both treatments, and reduction was also seen in night pain, where initial levels were lower. There was no significant difference between the number of patients who reported side effects on the 2 treatments. 37 patients (39%) reported 49 side effects while taking sustained release tiaprofenic acid, and 35 patients (37%) reported 53 side effects while taking sustained release indomethacin. Daily diary cards showed that both treatments provided improvements in duration of morning stiffness and in pain relief. Thus sustained action tiaprofenic acid and sustained release indomethacin were shown to be equally well tolerated and efficacious.

摘要

在一项随机双盲、多中心、交叉研究中,将98例骨关节炎患者每日一次服用600毫克噻洛芬酸缓释制剂的短期疗效和耐受性与每日一次服用75毫克吲哚美辛缓释制剂进行了比较。经过至少3天的洗脱期后,患者被随机分配依次接受每种治疗,为期4周。在每个治疗期结束时进行的疼痛程度、晨僵持续时间、关节指数和功能损害的临床评估中,两种治疗之间没有显著差异。两种治疗均能减轻运动时的高疼痛水平,对于初始水平较低的夜间疼痛也有减轻作用。报告两种治疗有副作用的患者数量没有显著差异。37例患者(39%)在服用噻洛芬酸缓释制剂时有49例副作用报告,35例患者(37%)在服用吲哚美辛缓释制剂时有53例副作用报告。每日日记卡显示,两种治疗在晨僵持续时间和疼痛缓解方面均有改善。因此,噻洛芬酸缓释制剂和吲哚美辛缓释制剂显示出同等良好的耐受性和疗效。

相似文献

1
Multicentre double-blind comparison of sustained action formulations of tiaprofenic acid and indomethacin in osteoarthritis.替诺昔康和吲哚美辛长效制剂治疗骨关节炎的多中心双盲比较
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 1:57-63. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800351-00013.
2
The long-term effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.非甾体抗炎药对膝骨关节炎的长期影响:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Oct;39(10):1095-101. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.10.1095.
3
A comparison of a sustained release preparation of tiaprofenic acid with the conventional tablet formulation and a placebo in rheumatoid arthritis.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1987;7(4):251-7.
4
Comparative double-blind study of tiaprofenic acid versus piroxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 1:64-7. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800351-00014.
5
Comparison of sustained-release with standard tiaprofenic acid in the treatment of rheumatic diseases in general practice.缓释型与标准噻洛芬酸在全科医疗中治疗风湿性疾病的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1987;10(7):486-93. doi: 10.1185/03007998709112408.
6
Treatment of osteoarthritis: a 3-month comparison between tiaprofenic acid and indomethacin.骨关节炎的治疗:噻洛芬酸与吲哚美辛的3个月比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8(5):295-301. doi: 10.1185/03007998309112387.
7
Comparison of gastrointestinal blood loss in healthy male volunteers during repeated administration of standard and sustained action tiaprofenic acid and sustained release indomethacin.健康男性志愿者在重复服用标准型和长效型噻洛芬酸以及缓释型吲哚美辛期间胃肠道失血情况的比较。
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 1:90-4. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800351-00021.
8
A controlled comparison of tiaprofenic acid and ibuprofen in osteoarthritis.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1985;5(3):161-4.
9
A comparative trial of the analgesic effect of tiaprofenic acid and indomethacin in post-operative pain following spinal surgery in patients with radicular syndrome.替诺昔康与吲哚美辛对神经根综合征患者脊柱手术后疼痛镇痛效果的比较试验。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1984;4(1):43-7.
10
Tiaprofenic acid. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in rheumatic diseases and pain states.噻洛芬酸。对其在风湿性疾病和疼痛状态下的药理特性及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1985 Mar;29(3):208-35. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198529030-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Tiaprofenic acid. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and use in the management of rheumatic diseases.噻洛芬酸。对其药理特性及在风湿性疾病治疗中的应用的重新评估。
Drugs. 1995 Dec;50(6):1050-75. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550060-00010.
2
Osteoarthritis 1991. Current drug treatment regimens.骨关节炎1991。当前的药物治疗方案。
Drugs. 1991 Feb;41(2):193-201. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199141020-00005.

本文引用的文献

1
An articular index for the assessment of osteoarthritis.一种用于评估骨关节炎的关节指数。
Ann Rheum Dis. 1981 Feb;40(1):75-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.40.1.75.
2
Short-term efficacy and tolerance of tiaprofenic acid ('Surgam') in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: multi-centre, placebo-controlled trials.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1982;8(4):215-23. doi: 10.1185/03007998209109770.
3
Comparison of sustained-release with standard tiaprofenic acid in the treatment of rheumatic diseases in general practice.缓释型与标准噻洛芬酸在全科医疗中治疗风湿性疾病的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1987;10(7):486-93. doi: 10.1185/03007998709112408.