Bisanz G L, Das J P, Mancini G
Child Dev. 1984 Oct;55(5):1845-54.
This experiment focused on differences that occur with age and reading skill in the use of phonemic codes in short-term retention tasks where stimuli were presented visually. In 1 condition, individuals recalled 6-letter strings composed of rhyming and nonrhyming letters after a 15-sec delay under conditions that permitted phonemic coding and rehearsal. 2 other conditions were designed to suppress (a) rehearsal of certain types of phonemic codes in the delay interval and (b) both phonemic coding at stimulus presentation and rehearsal. Subjects were grade 2 average readers matched in reading skill with grade 4 disabled readers, grade 4 average matched with grade 6 disabled, and grade 6 average matched with grade 4 superior readers. Average readers showed a decrease in errors with age in all 3 conditions, although performance was always better in the nonsuppression condition. In the latter, memory for nonrhyming letters was always better than memory for rhyming letters. Differential use of phonemic codes by good and poor readers in grades 4 and 6 was less than that found in previous research with younger children. Finally, by comparing the performances of grade 2 average with grade 4 disabled readers and grade 4 average with grade 6 disabled readers, the developmental lag hypothesis of reading disability was examined. Problems with testing the hypothesis are discussed.
本实验聚焦于在视觉呈现刺激的短期记忆任务中,年龄和阅读技能在音素编码使用上所产生的差异。在一种条件下,个体在允许音素编码和复述的条件下,经过15秒延迟后回忆由押韵和不押韵字母组成的6字母字符串。另外两种条件被设计用于抑制:(a)在延迟间隔中对某些类型音素编码的复述,以及(b)在刺激呈现时的音素编码和复述。受试者包括阅读技能与四年级残疾读者匹配的二年级普通读者、与六年级残疾读者匹配的四年级普通读者以及与四年级优秀读者匹配的六年级普通读者。普通读者在所有三种条件下随着年龄增长错误率均有所下降,尽管在无抑制条件下表现始终更好。在后一种情况下,对不押韵字母的记忆总是优于对押韵字母的记忆。四年级和六年级中阅读能力好与差的读者在音素编码使用上的差异小于先前针对年幼儿童的研究中所发现的差异。最后,通过比较二年级普通读者与四年级残疾读者以及四年级普通读者与六年级残疾读者的表现,对阅读障碍的发展滞后假说进行了检验。讨论了检验该假说时存在的问题。